• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

治疗困境:政治学视角

Treatment dilemma: a political science perspective.

作者信息

Whitley M P

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Northern Montana College, Havre 59501.

出版信息

J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 1991 Aug;29(8):35-9. doi: 10.3928/0279-3695-19910801-09.

DOI:10.3928/0279-3695-19910801-09
PMID:1920200
Abstract
  1. The hallmark of a free society is that adults are free to choose their own life plans. Those who are mentally ill with impaired rationality often experience a severe reduction in their freedom to act out personal life plans. 2. A paternalistic care environment in a liberal state will foster a treatment modality that promotes development of the ability to think, choose, and act in a rational manner and allows the recovering individual to practice the liberty to choose. 3. A common language and group consciousness must be developed, as well as a willingness of those involved to sacrifice some of their individual needs and desires to work toward providing a paternalistic care environment for the mentally ill as a common good.
摘要
  1. 自由社会的标志是成年人可以自由选择自己的人生规划。那些患有精神疾病且理性受损的人,其按照个人生活规划行事的自由往往会大幅减少。2. 自由国家中的家长式关怀环境将培育一种治疗模式,这种模式能促进以理性方式思考、选择和行动的能力发展,并让康复中的个体实践选择的自由。3. 必须形成一种共同语言和群体意识,而且相关人员要愿意牺牲一些个人需求和欲望,共同努力为精神疾病患者提供家长式关怀环境。

相似文献

1
Treatment dilemma: a political science perspective.治疗困境:政治学视角
J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 1991 Aug;29(8):35-9. doi: 10.3928/0279-3695-19910801-09.
2
The power gap: freedom, power and mental illness.权力差距:自由、权力与精神疾病
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Oct;63(8):2118-28. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.05.015. Epub 2006 Jun 15.
3
Respecting the autonomy of chronic mentally ill women in decisions about contraception.尊重患有慢性精神疾病的女性在避孕决策方面的自主权。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1993 Jul;44(7):671-4. doi: 10.1176/ps.44.7.671.
4
The chronically mentally ill: issues of individual freedom versus societal neglect.
J Community Health Nurs. 1992;9(1):33-41. doi: 10.1207/s15327655jchn0901_4.
5
[Psychiatric hospital: viewpoint of a general comptroller regarding deprivation of liberty].
Soins Psychiatr. 2014 Sep-Oct(294):5.
6
Treatment of the mentally ill: legal advocacy enters the second generation.精神病治疗:法律维权进入第二代。
Am J Psychiatry. 1986 Oct;143(10):1264-9. doi: 10.1176/ajp.143.10.1264.
7
Identifying a deprivation of liberty: a guide for community nurses.识别自由受限情况:社区护士指南
Br J Community Nurs. 2012 Nov;17(11):548-52. doi: 10.12968/bjcn.2012.17.11.548.
8
[Does restriction of sexual freedom according to article 169 of the Penal Code serve the mentally ill?].[根据《刑法典》第169条对性自由的限制对精神病患者有益吗?]
Psychiatr Pol. 1994 May-Jun;28(3):313-20.
9
The rhetorician's craft, distinctions in science, and political morality.修辞学家的技艺、科学中的区分以及政治道德。
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2006 May 2;1(1):E7. doi: 10.1186/1747-5341-1-7.
10
Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards: ethical and clinical implications.剥夺自由保障措施:伦理与临床意义
Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2015 Apr;76(4):230-3. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2015.76.4.230.

引用本文的文献

1
The Role of STATs in Ovarian Cancer: Exploring Their Potential for Therapy.信号转导和转录激活因子在卵巢癌中的作用:探索其治疗潜力
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Apr 26;15(9):2485. doi: 10.3390/cancers15092485.