Suppr超能文献

双心室起搏器/心脏再同步治疗设备植入期间的压力-容积环分析,以优化右心室和左心室起搏部位。

Pressure-volume loop analysis during implantation of biventricular pacemaker/cardiac resynchronization therapy device to optimize right and left ventricular pacing sites.

作者信息

Delnoy Peter Paul H M, Ottervanger Jan Paul, Luttikhuis Henk Oude, Vos Dick H S, Elvan Arif, Ramdat Misier Anand R, Beukema Willem P, Steendijk Paul, van Hemel Norbert M

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Isala klinieken, Groot Wezenland 20, Zwolle, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 2009 Apr;30(7):797-804. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp011. Epub 2009 Feb 7.

Abstract

AIMS

To evaluate the clinical utility of pressure-volume loop analyses during pacemaker/implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantations to assess the optimal right ventricular (RV) and/or left ventricular (LV) lead position.

METHODS AND RESULTS

29 patients with heart failure and chronic RV apical pacing were studied. Stroke work (SW), LV ejection fraction (LVEF), cardiac output (CO), and LV dP/dt(max) were assessed using a conductance catheter in the LV during RV apical, RV outflow tract, single-site LV, and biventricular pacing at different left-sided pacing locations. Left ventricular ejection fraction was 34.3 +/- 9.8%. Compared with baseline, RV outflow tract pacing showed a small increase of 4.0 +/- 6.4% in LV dP/dt(max) and no improvement in SW, LVEF, or CO. In the optimal biventricular configuration, SW increased 39 +/- 41%, LVEF increased 22 +/- 13%, CO increased 16 +/- 16%, and LV dP/dt(max) increased 10 +/- 11% (all P < 0.05). In 45% of the patients, the optimal LV lead position was found at a different location as the 'first choice' postero-lateral or lateral target vein.

CONCLUSION

Pressure-volume loop analysis during pacemaker/ICD implantations facilitates to determine the optimal LV pacing site. Patients with chronic RV pacing showed a significant acute improvement in LV function when LV pacing or biventricular pacing is applied.

摘要

目的

评估在起搏器/植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)植入过程中压力-容积环分析对于评估最佳右心室(RV)和/或左心室(LV)导线位置的临床实用性。

方法与结果

对29例心力衰竭且长期右心室心尖部起搏的患者进行研究。在不同左侧起搏位置进行右心室心尖部、右心室流出道、单部位左心室和双心室起搏时,使用位于左心室内的电导导管评估每搏功(SW)、左心室射血分数(LVEF)、心输出量(CO)和左心室最大dp/dt。左心室射血分数为34.3±9.8%。与基线相比,右心室流出道起搏时左心室最大dp/dt仅小幅增加4.0±6.4%,每搏功、左心室射血分数或心输出量无改善。在最佳双心室配置下,每搏功增加39±41%,左心室射血分数增加22±13%,心输出量增加16±16%,左心室最大dp/dt增加10±11%(均P<0.05)。45%的患者中,最佳左心室导线位置与“首选”的后外侧或外侧目标静脉位置不同。

结论

起搏器/ICD植入过程中的压力-容积环分析有助于确定最佳左心室起搏部位。长期右心室起搏患者应用左心室起搏或双心室起搏时,左心室功能有显著急性改善。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验