• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受三部位心室起搏治疗晚期心力衰竭的急性血液动力学应答者的临床和操作特征。

Clinical and procedural characteristics of acute hemodynamic responders undergoing triple-site ventricular pacing for advanced heart failure.

机构信息

Cardiovascular Division, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tsukuba Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, Ibaraki, Japan.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2011 Nov 1;108(9):1297-304. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.06.048. Epub 2011 Aug 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.06.048
PMID:21855835
Abstract

The advantages of triple-site ventricular pacing (Tri-V) compared to conventional biventricular site pacing (Bi-V) have been reported. We sought to identify the predictors of acute hemodynamic Tri-V responders. Acute hemodynamic studies were performed in 32 patients with advanced heart failure during Tri-V implantation. After the right ventricular (RV) and left ventricular (LV) leads were implanted for a conventional Bi-V system, an additional pacing lead was implanted in the RV outflow tract for Tri-V. The LV peak +dP/dt and tau were measured during AAI, Bi-V, and Tri-V pacing. A Tri-V responder was defined as a patient whose percentage of increase in the peak +dP/dt during Tri-V was >10% compared to of that during Bi-V. The baseline clinical variables and RV outflow tract lead location were analyzed to identify the characteristics of the Tri-V responders. Of the 32 patients, 10 (31%) were classified as Tri-V responders. The LV end-diastolic volume was greater (246 ± 48 vs 173 ± 53 ml, p <0.01), and the RV outflow tract lead was implanted at a greater outflow tract portion (p <0.05) in the Tri-V responders. Multivariate analysis revealed that only the baseline LV end-diastolic volume (per 50-ml greater) predicted the Tri-V response (odds ratio 2.87, 95% confidence interval 1.03 to 8.00, p <0.05). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the LV end-diastolic volume was 0.84 (p <0.01) and an LV end-diastolic volume of >212 ml had a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 77% to distinguish Tri-V responders. In conclusion, Tri-V provides greater hemodynamic effect for patients with a larger LV end-diastolic volume owing to its resynchronization effects on the LV anterior wall.

摘要

与传统双心室部位起搏(Bi-V)相比,三部位心室起搏(Tri-V)具有优势。我们旨在确定急性血流动力学Tri-V 反应者的预测因素。在 Tri-V 植入期间,对 32 例晚期心力衰竭患者进行了急性血流动力学研究。在植入常规 Bi-V 系统的右心室(RV)和左心室(LV)导线后,在 RV 流出道植入了一个额外的起搏导线以实现 Tri-V。在 AAI、Bi-V 和 Tri-V 起搏期间测量 LV 峰 +dP/dt 和 tau。将 Tri-V 反应者定义为与 Bi-V 相比,Tri-V 期间峰 +dP/dt 增加百分比> 10%的患者。分析基线临床变量和 RV 流出道导联位置,以确定 Tri-V 反应者的特征。在 32 例患者中,有 10 例(31%)被归类为 Tri-V 反应者。Tri-V 反应者的 LV 舒张末期容积更大(246 ± 48 比 173 ± 53 ml,p <0.01),RV 流出道导联植入于 RV 流出道更大的部分(p <0.05)。多变量分析显示,只有基线 LV 舒张末期容积(每增加 50-ml)可预测 Tri-V 反应(优势比 2.87,95%置信区间 1.03 至 8.00,p <0.05)。LV 舒张末期容积的接收器操作特性曲线下面积为 0.84(p <0.01),LV 舒张末期容积> 212 ml 时,区分 Tri-V 反应者的敏感性为 80%,特异性为 77%。总之,由于 Tri-V 对 LV 前壁具有再同步化作用,因此对于 LV 舒张末期容积较大的患者,Tri-V 可提供更大的血流动力学效果。

相似文献

1
Clinical and procedural characteristics of acute hemodynamic responders undergoing triple-site ventricular pacing for advanced heart failure.接受三部位心室起搏治疗晚期心力衰竭的急性血液动力学应答者的临床和操作特征。
Am J Cardiol. 2011 Nov 1;108(9):1297-304. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.06.048. Epub 2011 Aug 17.
2
Effect of triangle ventricular pacing on haemodynamics and dyssynchrony in patients with advanced heart failure: a comparison study with conventional bi-ventricular pacing therapy.三角形心室起搏对晚期心力衰竭患者血流动力学及不同步性的影响:与传统双心室起搏治疗的比较研究
Eur Heart J. 2007 Nov;28(21):2610-9. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm441. Epub 2007 Oct 18.
3
Comparison of acute changes in left ventricular volume, systolic and diastolic functions, and intraventricular synchronicity after biventricular and right ventricular pacing for heart failure.双心室起搏与右心室起搏治疗心力衰竭后左心室容积、收缩和舒张功能及心室内同步性的急性变化比较
Am Heart J. 2003 May;145(5):E18. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8703(03)00071-1.
4
Pressure-volume loop analysis during implantation of biventricular pacemaker/cardiac resynchronization therapy device to optimize right and left ventricular pacing sites.双心室起搏器/心脏再同步治疗设备植入期间的压力-容积环分析,以优化右心室和左心室起搏部位。
Eur Heart J. 2009 Apr;30(7):797-804. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp011. Epub 2009 Feb 7.
5
Acute effects of His bundle pacing versus left ventricular and right ventricular pacing on left ventricular function.希氏束起搏与左心室和右心室起搏对左心室功能的急性影响。
Am J Cardiol. 2007 Nov 15;100(10):1556-60. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.06.055.
6
Effect of long-term resynchronization therapy on left ventricular remodeling in pacemaker patients upgraded to biventricular devices.长期再同步治疗对升级为双心室起搏器患者左心室重构的影响。
Am J Cardiol. 2009 May 1;103(9):1280-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.01.023.
7
Antiarrhythmic effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy with triple-site biventricular stimulation.三部位双心室起搏的心脏再同步治疗的抗心律失常作用。
Europace. 2013 Oct;15(10):1491-8. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut134. Epub 2013 May 21.
8
A randomized comparison of triple-site versus dual-site ventricular stimulation in patients with congestive heart failure.充血性心力衰竭患者三部位与双部位心室刺激的随机对照研究
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Apr 15;51(15):1455-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.11.074.
9
Does RV lead positioning provide additional benefit to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with advanced heart failure?右心室电极定位对晚期心力衰竭患者的心脏再同步治疗是否有额外益处?
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2006 Oct;29(10):1069-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2006.00500.x.
10
[Acute hemodynamic effects of biventricular and left ventricular pacing in chronic pacemaker-dependent patients with advanced heart failure].[双心室和左心室起搏对慢性起搏器依赖型晚期心力衰竭患者的急性血流动力学影响]
Z Kardiol. 2003 Oct;92(10):862-8. doi: 10.1007/s00392-003-0976-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Multi-lead pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.心力衰竭患者心脏再同步治疗中的多导联起搏:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Eur Heart J Open. 2022 Feb 26;2(2):oeac013. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeac013. eCollection 2022 Mar.
2
Triventricular pacing improved dyssynchrony in heart failure patient with right-bundle branch block and left anterior fascicular block.三腔起搏改善了右束支传导阻滞和左前分支阻滞心力衰竭患者的不同步情况。
J Cardiol Cases. 2014 Feb 5;9(4):158-161. doi: 10.1016/j.jccase.2013.12.013. eCollection 2014 Apr.
3
Comparison of triple-site ventricular pacing versus conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with systolic heart failure: A meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies.
收缩性心力衰竭患者三部位心室起搏与传统心脏再同步治疗的比较:一项随机和观察性研究的荟萃分析
J Arrhythm. 2017 Dec 21;34(1):55-64. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12018. eCollection 2018 Feb.
4
Updates in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy for Chronic Heart Failure: Review of Multisite Pacing.慢性心力衰竭心脏再同步治疗的进展:多部位起搏综述
Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2017 Oct;14(5):376-383. doi: 10.1007/s11897-017-0350-z.
5
Multisite Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Promise and Pitfalls.心脏再同步治疗的多部位起搏:前景与陷阱
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2016 Jul;18(7):64. doi: 10.1007/s11886-016-0741-x.
6
Hemodynamic effects of Purkinje potential pacing in the left ventricular endocardium in patients with advanced heart failure.晚期心力衰竭患者左心室内膜浦肯野电位起搏的血流动力学效应
J Arrhythm. 2015 Dec;31(6):371-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joa.2015.06.005. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
7
Left ventricular endocardial pacing and multisite pacing to improve CRT response.左心室心内膜起搏和多点起搏改善 CRT 反应。
J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2012 Apr;5(2):213-8. doi: 10.1007/s12265-011-9342-7. Epub 2012 Jan 11.