Medical Clinic II, University of Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany.
Clin Res Cardiol. 2012 Aug;101(8):647-53. doi: 10.1007/s00392-012-0439-z. Epub 2012 Mar 9.
Atrioventricular (AV) interval optimization is often deemed too time-consuming in dual-chamber pacemaker patients with maintained LV function. Thus the majority of patients are left at their default AV interval.
To quantify the magnitude of hemodynamic improvement following AV interval optimization in chronically paced dual chamber pacemaker patients.
A pressure volume catheter was placed in the left ventricle of 19 patients with chronic dual chamber pacing and an ejection fraction >45 % undergoing elective coronary angiography. AV interval was varied in 10 ms steps from 80 to 300 ms, and pressure volume loops were recorded during breath hold.
The average optimal AV interval was 152 ± 39 ms compared to 155 ± 8 ms for the average default AV interval (range 100-240 ms). The average improvement in stroke work following AV interval optimization was 935 ± 760 mmHg/ml (range 0-2,908; p < 0.001), which translates into an average improvement of 14 ± 9 % (range 0-28). A 10 ms variation of the AV interval changes the average stroke work by 207 ± 162 mmHg/ml. AV interval optimization also leads to improved systolic dyssynchrony indices (17.7 ± 7.0 vs. 19.4 ± 7.1 %; p = 0.01).
The overall hemodynamic effect of AV interval optimization in patients with maintained LV function is in the same range as for patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy for several parameters. The positive effect of AV interval optimization also applies to patients who have been chronically paced for years.
在左心室射血分数(LVEF)正常的双腔起搏器患者中,房室(AV)间期优化通常被认为过于耗时,因此大多数患者仍保持默认的 AV 间期。
定量评估在慢性双腔起搏器起搏患者中优化 AV 间期对血流动力学的改善程度。
19 例行择期冠状动脉造影检查的慢性双腔起搏且 LVEF>45%的患者,左心室内置入压力-容积导管。AV 间期在 80 至 300ms 之间以 10ms 的步长变化,并在屏气时记录压力-容积环。
平均最佳 AV 间期为 152±39ms,而平均默认 AV 间期为 155±8ms(范围 100-240ms)。AV 间期优化后,每搏功平均改善 935±760mmHg/ml(范围 0-2908;p<0.001),相当于平均改善 14±9%(范围 0-28)。AV 间期变化 10ms 可改变每搏功 207±162mmHg/ml。AV 间期优化还可改善收缩不同步指数(17.7±7.0%比 19.4±7.1%;p=0.01)。
在 LVEF 正常的患者中,优化 AV 间期对血流动力学的总体影响与接受心脏再同步治疗的患者多项参数相当。AV 间期优化的积极作用也适用于已慢性起搏多年的患者。