• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病患者联合用药队列中药物的合理性与监测

Appropriateness and surveillance of medication in a cohort of diabetic patients on polypharmacy.

作者信息

Harder S, Saal K, Blauth E, Beyer M, Gerlach F M

机构信息

Institute for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Feb;47(2):104-10. doi: 10.5414/cpp47104.

DOI:10.5414/cpp47104
PMID:19203566
Abstract

CONTEXT

It is assumed that with increasing polypharmacy, medication surveillance by the General Practitioner (GP) and adherence to the therapy regimen by the patient will both decline.

AIM OF THE STUDY

We evaluated clinical and medication records taken from GP documentations in a cohort of 102 diabetic patients (48 f, 54 m, median age 70, range 39 - 81) with 3 or more chronic prescriptions. Patients were asked about their current medication and its tolerability by means of a structured telephone interview.

RESULTS

45% of the patients received up to 6 medications, 36% 7 - 9 and 19% > 10. The main comorbidity was hypertension (93%) and symptomatic CAD (39%). The use of established medications (beta-blockers and ACE inhibitors) for these comorbidities was appropriate. Although 76% were eligible for a statin therapy, only 51% actually took a statin, and 28% had a dose lower than the defined daily dose. 68% of the patients had no prescriptions other than those recorded in the GP documentation, but 8% of the total number of medicines taken by the patients were not recorded in the GP's database. 62% of patients took all the medication prescribed by the GP, while 7% of all medicines recorded in the GP's database were not taken by the patients. In 10% of cases, an incompatible medication (defined in accordance with a consented list) was taken by the patient. 81% of patients regularly (twice per year) had their HbA1c checked, but only 62% had their potassium levels checked, despite the use of ACI and diuretics. Most patients knew the reason for taking at least one medication, but 18% knew this for less than half of their (multiple) medications. 70% of the patients said they had been informed about the possible risks of their medication by the GP, and 7% knew the risks for only one medication.

CONCLUSION

In this cohort of patients on polypharmacy and with a high risk profile for adverse drug reactions, we found a mismatch between GPs' documentation of prescriptions and the medication taken by the patient. Patients had no detailed knowledge about indications and almost no knowledge about risks. Although the overall performance of therapy (appropriateness) was deemed sufficient, there would appear to be room for improvement in order to fill information gaps and strive for stricter surveillance.

摘要

背景

假定随着联合用药的增加,全科医生(GP)的用药监测以及患者对治疗方案的依从性都会下降。

研究目的

我们评估了从102例患有3种或更多慢性处方的糖尿病患者(48名女性,54名男性,年龄中位数70岁,范围39 - 81岁)的全科医生记录中获取的临床和用药记录。通过结构化电话访谈询问患者其当前用药情况及其耐受性。

结果

45%的患者服用多达6种药物,36%服用7 - 9种,19%服用超过10种。主要合并症为高血压(93%)和有症状的冠心病(39%)。针对这些合并症使用的既定药物(β受体阻滞剂和ACE抑制剂)是恰当的。尽管76%的患者符合他汀类药物治疗条件,但实际只有51%服用了他汀类药物,且28%的患者服用剂量低于规定日剂量。68%的患者除了全科医生记录中的处方外没有其他处方,但患者所服用药物总数的8%未记录在全科医生的数据库中。62%的患者服用了全科医生开的所有药物,而全科医生数据库中记录的所有药物中有7%患者未服用。在10%的病例中,患者服用了不相容药物(根据一份商定清单定义)。81%的患者定期(每年两次)检查糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c),但尽管使用了ACE抑制剂和利尿剂,只有62%的患者检查了血钾水平。大多数患者知道至少一种药物的服用原因,但18%的患者对其(多种)药物中不到一半的药物了解服用原因。70%的患者表示他们已从全科医生处得知其用药可能存在的风险,7%的患者仅知道一种药物的风险。

结论

在这组联合用药且药物不良反应风险较高的患者中,我们发现全科医生的处方记录与患者所服用药物之间存在差异。患者对用药指征没有详细了解,对风险几乎一无所知。尽管治疗的总体表现(恰当性)被认为是足够的,但为了填补信息空白并加强监测,似乎仍有改进空间。

相似文献

1
Appropriateness and surveillance of medication in a cohort of diabetic patients on polypharmacy.糖尿病患者联合用药队列中药物的合理性与监测
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Feb;47(2):104-10. doi: 10.5414/cpp47104.
2
Polypharmacy and health beliefs in older outpatients.老年门诊患者的多重用药与健康观念
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2007 Dec;5(4):317-23. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2007.12.001.
3
Assessment of Patient Medication Adherence, Medical Record Accuracy, and Medication Blood Concentrations for Prescription and Over-the-Counter Medications.评估患者用药依从性、病历准确性以及处方药和非处方药的血药浓度。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Nov 2;1(7):e184196. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.4196.
4
Patient-perceived barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a medication review in primary care: a qualitative thematic analysis.初级保健中患者对实施用药评估的认知障碍与促进因素:一项定性主题分析
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Jan 5;19(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0707-0.
5
GPs' management of polypharmacy and therapeutic dilemma in patients with multimorbidity: a cross-sectional survey of GPs in France.全科医生管理多病共存患者的多种药物治疗和治疗困境:法国全科医生的横断面调查。
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Apr;69(681):e270-e278. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X701801. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
6
Prevalence of inappropriate prescribing in primary care.基层医疗中不适当处方的流行情况。
Pharm World Sci. 2007 Jun;29(3):109-15. doi: 10.1007/s11096-007-9108-0. Epub 2007 Mar 13.
7
General practitioners' views on polypharmacy and its consequences for patient health care.全科医生对多种药物并用及其对患者医疗保健的影响的看法。
BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Aug 15;14:119. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-119.
8
Discrepancies in reported drug use in geriatric outpatients: relevance to adverse events and drug-drug interactions.老年门诊患者报告的药物使用差异:与不良事件和药物相互作用的相关性。
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2009 Apr;7(2):93-104. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2009.04.006.
9
Prevalence and risk of polypharmacy among the elderly in an outpatient setting: a retrospective cohort study in the Emilia-Romagna region, Italy.意大利艾米利亚-罗马涅地区门诊老年患者多药治疗的流行率和风险:一项回顾性队列研究。
Drugs Aging. 2010 Dec 1;27(12):1019-28. doi: 10.2165/11584990-000000000-00000.
10
Evaluation of polypharmacy and appropriateness of prescription in geriatric patients: A cross-sectional study at a tertiary care hospital.老年患者多重用药及处方适宜性评估:一项三级医院的横断面研究。
Indian J Pharmacol. 2017 Jan-Feb;49(1):16-20. doi: 10.4103/0253-7613.201036.

引用本文的文献

1
Patients' knowledge of the indications for their medications - a scoping review.患者对其用药适应证的认知 - 范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 8;24(1):1195. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11685-7.
2
Potentially inappropriate prescribing for adults living with diabetes mellitus: a scoping review.成年人糖尿病潜在不适当处方:范围综述。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2022 Aug;44(4):860-872. doi: 10.1007/s11096-022-01414-7. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
3
Discrepancies between prescribed and defined daily doses: a matter of patients or drug classes?
规定日剂量与定义日剂量之间的差异:是患者的问题还是药物类别的问题?
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Aug;67(8):847-54. doi: 10.1007/s00228-011-1014-7. Epub 2011 Mar 10.
4
Cardiovascular co-medication among users of antiobesity drugs: a population-based study.抗肥胖药物使用者的心血管联合用药:一项基于人群的研究。
Pharm World Sci. 2010 Dec;32(6):752-8. doi: 10.1007/s11096-010-9432-7. Epub 2010 Aug 29.