• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于肝脏局灶性肿块特征分析的扩散加权磁共振成像:并行成像(敏感性编码技术)和b值的影响

Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for characterization of focal liver masses: impact of parallel imaging (SENSE) and b value.

作者信息

Erturk Sukru Mehmet, Ichikawa Tomoaki, Sano Katsuhiro, Motosugi Utarou, Sou Hironobu, Araki Tsutomu

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Sisli Etfal Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2008 Nov-Dec;32(6):865-71. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181591cf2.

DOI:10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181591cf2
PMID:19204445
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of parallel imaging (sensitivity encoding [SENSE] technique) on diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance imaging, compare DW imaging techniques with 2 different b values for characterization of focal hepatic lesions, and determine apparent diffusion coefficient cutoff values.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-eight patients with 86 lesions were examined with 4 different DW techniques with 2 different b values (400 and 1000 s/mm2) and with/without the use of SENSE. The differences in signal-noise ratio values and image quality between DW images obtained with different techniques were compared using repeated-measures analysis of variance and Friedman test, respectively. A receiver operating characteristic analysis was applied to evaluate the apparent diffusion coefficient values as a discriminating variable to differentiate malignant lesions from benign ones; sensitivity and specificity were calculated.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the signal-noise ratio value and image quality between DW images obtained with b = 400 s/mm2 without SENSE (DW400) and b = 1000 s/mm2 with SENSE (DW1000SENSE). DW1000SENSE had the highest Az values for discriminating malignant from benign hepatic lesions (0.97) and hemangioma from metastasis (0.89). Using 1.63 x 10(-3) mm2/s as the cutoff value, DW1000SENSE had a sensitivity of 95.2% (40/42) and a specificity of 91.0% (40/44) for differentiating benign from malignant hepatic lesions. Using a cutoff value of 1.45 x 10(-3) mm2/s, DW1000SENSE had a sensitivity of 90.5% (19/21) and a specificity of 93.7% (15/16) for differentiating metastases from hemangiomas.

CONCLUSIONS

Diffusion-weighted imaging with a b value of 1000 s/mm2 and SENSE has the potential to differentiate hepatic focal lesions with improved sensitivity and specificity.

摘要

目的

评估并行成像(灵敏度编码[SENSE]技术)对扩散加权(DW)磁共振成像的影响,比较具有两种不同b值的DW成像技术在肝脏局灶性病变特征描述中的作用,并确定表观扩散系数的临界值。

材料与方法

对78例患者的86个病变采用4种不同的DW技术进行检查,b值分别为400和1000 s/mm2,且分别在使用和不使用SENSE的情况下进行。分别采用重复测量方差分析和Friedman检验比较不同技术获得的DW图像之间的信噪比和图像质量差异。应用受试者操作特征分析来评估表观扩散系数值作为区分恶性病变与良性病变的判别变量;计算灵敏度和特异度。

结果

在不使用SENSE的b = 400 s/mm2的DW图像(DW400)和使用SENSE的b = 1000 s/mm2的DW图像(DW1000SENSE)之间,信噪比和图像质量无显著差异。DW1000SENSE在区分肝脏恶性与良性病变(Az值为0.97)以及血管瘤与转移瘤(Az值为0.89)方面具有最高的Az值。以1.63×10(-3) mm2/s作为临界值,DW1000SENSE在区分肝脏良性与恶性病变时灵敏度为95.2%(40/42),特异度为91.0%(40/44)。以1.45×10(-3) mm2/s作为临界值,DW1000SENSE在区分转移瘤与血管瘤时灵敏度为90.5%(19/21),特异度为93.7%(15/16)。

结论

b值为1000 s/mm2并结合SENSE的扩散加权成像有潜力以更高的灵敏度和特异度区分肝脏局灶性病变。

相似文献

1
Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for characterization of focal liver masses: impact of parallel imaging (SENSE) and b value.用于肝脏局灶性肿块特征分析的扩散加权磁共振成像:并行成像(敏感性编码技术)和b值的影响
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2008 Nov-Dec;32(6):865-71. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181591cf2.
2
Diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver: optimizing b value for the detection and characterization of benign and malignant hepatic lesions.肝脏的扩散加权成像:优化b值以检测和鉴别肝脏良恶性病变
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Sep;28(3):691-7. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21467.
3
Value of apparent diffusion coefficient measurement for discrimination of focal benign and malignant hepatic masses.表观扩散系数测量在鉴别肝脏局灶性良恶性肿块中的价值。
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2009 Feb;53(1):50-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-9485.2009.02036.x.
4
High-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging of benign hepatocellular lesions: quantitative and qualitative analysis.高 b 值扩散加权磁共振成像在良性肝细胞性病变中的应用:定量和定性分析。
Radiology. 2012 Feb;262(2):511-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11110922. Epub 2011 Dec 5.
5
Comparison between two-point and four-point methods for quantification of apparent diffusion coefficient of normal liver parenchyma and focal lesions. Value of normalization with spleen.两点法与四点法测量正常肝脏实质和局灶性病变表观扩散系数的比较。用脾脏进行标准化的价值。
Eur J Radiol. 2010 Feb;73(2):305-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.10.023. Epub 2008 Dec 16.
6
Tissue characterization of head and neck lesions using diffusion-weighted MR imaging with SPLICE.使用具有SPLICE的扩散加权磁共振成像对头颈部病变进行组织特征分析。
Eur J Radiol. 2009 Feb;69(2):260-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.10.008. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
7
Role of apparent diffusion coefficient values and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in differentiation between benign and malignant thyroid nodules.表观扩散系数值及弥散加权磁共振成像在甲状腺良恶性结节鉴别诊断中的作用。
Clin Imaging. 2012 Jan-Feb;36(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2011.04.001.
8
Pediatric abdominal masses: diagnostic accuracy of diffusion weighted MRI.小儿腹部肿块:弥散加权 MRI 的诊断准确性。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2010 Jun;28(5):629-36. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2010.02.010. Epub 2010 Apr 8.
9
Hepatic hemangioma: correlation of enhancement types with diffusion-weighted MR findings and apparent diffusion coefficients.肝血管瘤:强化类型与磁共振扩散加权成像表现及表观扩散系数的相关性
Eur J Radiol. 2009 May;70(2):325-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.01.035. Epub 2008 Mar 5.
10
Diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging in differentiating benign from malignant ovarian lesions.扩散加权成像在鉴别卵巢良恶性病变中的诊断准确性
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Nov;28(5):1149-56. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21575.

引用本文的文献

1
Application values of 3.0T magnetic resonance diffusion weighted imaging for distinguishing liver malignant tumors and benign lesions.3.0T磁共振扩散加权成像在鉴别肝脏恶性肿瘤与良性病变中的应用价值
Oncol Lett. 2018 Feb;15(2):2091-2096. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.7565. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
2
[Importance of diffusion imaging in liver metastases].[扩散成像在肝转移瘤中的重要性]
Radiologe. 2017 May;57(5):382-391. doi: 10.1007/s00117-017-0233-z.
3
Lesion discrimination with breath-hold hepatic diffusion-weighted imaging: a meta-analysis.
屏气肝脏扩散加权成像的病变鉴别:一项荟萃分析。
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Feb 7;21(5):1621-7. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i5.1621.
4
Preoperative evaluation of the histological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma with diffusion-weighted imaging: a meta-analysis.弥散加权成像对肝细胞癌组织学分级的术前评估:一项荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 6;10(2):e0117661. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117661. eCollection 2015.
5
Diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging with conventional MR imaging for differentiating complex solid and cystic ovarian tumors at 1.5T.1.5T 常规磁共振成像与扩散加权成像对鉴别复杂实性和囊实性卵巢肿瘤的诊断准确性。
World J Surg Oncol. 2012 Nov 9;10:237. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-10-237.
6
Accuracy of visual analysis vs. apparent diffusion coefficient quantification in differentiating solid benign and malignant focal liver lesions with diffusion-weighted imaging.视觉分析与表观扩散系数定量在鉴别扩散加权成像中肝脏局灶性良恶性病变的准确性。
Radiol Med. 2013 Apr;118(3):343-55. doi: 10.1007/s11547-012-0873-z. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
7
Diffusion-weighted MR imaging before and after contrast enhancement with superparamagnetic iron oxide for assessment of hepatic metastasis.超顺磁性氧化铁对比增强前后弥散加权磁共振成像在肝转移评估中的应用。
Yonsei Med J. 2012 Jul 1;53(4):825-33. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2012.53.4.825.