Suppr超能文献

在脊柱手术俯卧位时通过外周静脉导管测量中心静脉压。

Measurement of central venous pressure from a peripheral intravenous catheter in the prone position during spinal surgery.

作者信息

Tobias Joseph D

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65212, USA.

出版信息

South Med J. 2009 Mar;102(3):256-9. doi: 10.1097/SMJ.0b013e3181971614.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

A central venous pressure (CVP) measurement is used to assess intravascular status. Although this is usually accomplished by the placement of a central venous catheter (CVC), there are circumstances when placement may be technically difficult or impossible. The current study evaluates the feasibility of measuring CVP from a peripheral intravenous (IV) cannula in the prone position.

METHODS

CVP was simultaneously measured from a central venous catheter (CVC-P) and from a peripheral IV cannula (PVP). The continuity of the peripheral IV cannula with the central venous system was demonstrated by a change in the PVP during a sustained inspiratory effort.

RESULTS

The study cohort included 18 patients. All patients had 2 peripheral IV cannulae, and 10 PVP measurements were taken from each site. In 4 of the 36 cannulae (11%), there was no increase in the PVP in response to a sustained inspiratory effort. For these 4 cannulae, the PVP to CVC-P difference was 13 +/- 4 mm Hg. In the 32 cannulae in which the PVP increased in response to a sustained inspiratory effort, the PVP to CVC-P difference was 2 +/- 1 mm Hg (P < 0.0001), and the difference between the PVP and the CVC-P was <or=5 mm Hg in all of the sample sets. The accuracy of the technique did not vary based on the location of the peripheral cannula, its size, or the actual CVP reading.

CONCLUSION

Provided that the PVP increases to a sustained inspiratory breath, there is a clinically useful correlation between the PVP and the actual CVP in the prone position.

摘要

引言

中心静脉压(CVP)测量用于评估血管内状态。虽然这通常通过放置中心静脉导管(CVC)来完成,但在某些情况下,放置可能在技术上困难或无法实现。本研究评估了在俯卧位从外周静脉留置针测量CVP的可行性。

方法

同时从中心静脉导管(CVC-P)和外周静脉留置针(PVP)测量CVP。在持续吸气时PVP的变化证明了外周静脉留置针与中心静脉系统的连续性。

结果

研究队列包括18名患者。所有患者均有2个外周静脉留置针,每个部位进行10次PVP测量。在36个留置针中的4个(11%)中,持续吸气时PVP没有增加。对于这4个留置针,PVP与CVC-P的差值为13±4 mmHg。在32个持续吸气时PVP增加的留置针中,PVP与CVC-P的差值为2±1 mmHg(P<0.0001),并且在所有样本组中PVP与CVC-P的差值≤5 mmHg。该技术的准确性不会因外周留置针的位置、其尺寸或实际CVP读数而有所不同。

结论

如果PVP在持续吸气时增加,俯卧位时PVP与实际CVP之间存在临床上有用的相关性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验