Grave K, Bangen M, Engelstad M, Søli N E
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Norwegian College of Veterinary Medicine/National Veterinary Institute, Oslo.
J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 1991 Jun;14(2):150-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2885.1991.tb00817.x.
Compliance with Norwegian legal regulations for veterinary prescriptions was investigated and evaluated. The study was designed as a cross-sectional prescription survey, and the prescriptions were recorded in Dbase III. Of the 6505 written and telephone prescriptions collected only about one in five fulfilled the legal requirements, namely, giving information about the animal species the drug was intended for, indication for the prescribed drug and directions for use. On average 86% contained information about the animal species, while 26% and 80%, respectively, contained formation about the indication for the prescribed drug and directions for use. The number of prescriptions on which indication and directions for use were given, was significantly higher for written prescriptions than for telephone prescriptions, and for prescriptions of human preparations compared with prescriptions of veterinary preparations. For pets, the number of prescriptions containing directions for use was significantly higher than for production animals. The proportion of prescriptions for pets giving a statement of the indication was not significantly different from prescriptions for production animals.
对挪威兽医处方法律法规的遵守情况进行了调查和评估。该研究设计为横断面处方调查,处方记录在Dbase III中。在收集的6505份书面和电话处方中,只有约五分之一符合法律要求,即提供药物适用动物种类、处方药适应症和使用说明的信息。平均而言,86%的处方包含动物种类信息,而分别有26%和80%的处方包含处方药适应症和使用说明的信息。给出适应症和使用说明的处方数量,书面处方显著高于电话处方,与人用制剂处方相比,兽用制剂处方的该数量也显著更高。对于宠物,包含使用说明的处方数量显著高于生产用动物。宠物处方给出适应症说明的比例与生产用动物处方相比无显著差异。