Fonagy Peter, Twemlow Stuart W, Vernberg Eric M, Nelson Jennifer Mize, Dill Edward J, Little Todd D, Sargent John A
Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2009 May;50(5):607-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.02025.x. Epub 2009 Jan 26.
While school-based anti-bullying programs are widely used, there have been few controlled trials of effectiveness. This study compared the effect of manualized School Psychiatric Consultation (SPC), CAPSLE (a systems and mentalization focused whole school intervention), and treatment-as-usual (TAU) in reducing aggression and victimization among elementary school children.
Participants were 1,345 third to fifth graders in nine elementary schools in a medium-sized Midwestern city who took part in a cluster-level randomized controlled trial with stratified restricted allocation, to assess efficacy after two years of active intervention and effectiveness after one year of minimal input maintenance intervention. Outcome measures included peer and self-reports of bullying, bystanding, and mentalizing behavior and classroom behavioral observations of disruptive and off-task behavior.
CAPSLE moderated the developmental trend of increasing peer-reported victimization (p < .01), aggression (p < .05), self-reported aggression (p < .05) and aggressive bystanding (p < .05), compared to TAU schools. CAPSLE also moderated a decline in empathy and an increase in the percent of children victimized compared to SPC (p < .01) and TAU conditions (p < .01). Results for self-reported victimization, helpful bystanding, and beliefs in the legitimacy of aggression did not suggest significantly different changes among the study conditions over time. CAPSLE produced a significant decrease in off-task (p < .001) and disruptive classroom behaviors (p < .01), while behavioral change was not observed in SPC and TAU schools. Superiority with respect to TAU for victimization (p < .05), aggression (p < .01), and helpful (p < .05) and aggressive bystanding (p < .01) were maintained in the follow-up year.
A teacher-implemented school-wide intervention that does not focus on disturbed children substantially reduced aggression and improved classroom behavior.
虽然基于学校的反欺凌项目被广泛使用,但很少有对照试验来验证其有效性。本研究比较了手册化的学校心理咨询(SPC)、CAPSLE(一种以系统和心理化为重点的全校干预措施)以及常规治疗(TAU)在减少小学生攻击行为和受欺负情况方面的效果。
参与者是美国中西部一个中等城市九所小学的1345名三至五年级学生,他们参加了一项整群随机对照试验,采用分层受限分配,以评估两年积极干预后的疗效以及一年最小投入维持干预后的效果。结果测量包括同伴和自我报告的欺凌、旁观以及心理化行为,以及对破坏性行为和任务外行为的课堂行为观察。
与采用常规治疗的学校相比,CAPSLE减缓了同伴报告的受欺负情况(p <.01)、攻击行为(p <.05)、自我报告的攻击行为(p <.05)和攻击性旁观行为(p <.05)增加的发展趋势。与学校心理咨询(p <.01)和常规治疗情况(p <.01)相比,CAPSLE还减缓了同理心的下降以及受欺负儿童比例的增加。自我报告的受欺负情况、有益的旁观行为以及对攻击行为合法性的信念结果表明,随着时间推移,各研究情况之间没有显著差异。CAPSLE使任务外行为(p <.001)和破坏课堂行为(p <.01)显著减少,而在学校心理咨询和采用常规治疗的学校中未观察到行为变化。在随访年中,在受欺负情况(p <.05)、攻击行为(p <.01)以及有益(p <.05)和攻击性旁观行为(p <.01)方面相对于常规治疗的优势得以维持。
一种由教师实施的全校干预措施,若不针对有困扰的儿童,可大幅减少攻击行为并改善课堂行为。