Chelouche-Dwek Gali, Fonagy Peter
Psychoanalysis Unit, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2025 Apr;34(4):1295-1315. doi: 10.1007/s00787-024-02578-5. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
Mentalization-based interventions (MBIs) have been increasingly applied in school settings to support the social-emotional development and mental health of children and adolescents. This systematic review aimed to synthesize the evidence on the effectiveness of MBIs implemented in educational contexts for students aged 6-18 years. A comprehensive search was conducted in PsychInfo, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and ERIC databases from inception to October 2023. The search strategy combined terms related to mentalization, school-based interventions, and the target age group. The review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022302757). Inclusion criteria included peer-reviewed publications in English, studies published between 1980 and 2023, interventions based on mentalization principles, and a primary focus on children aged 6 to 18 years. Exclusion criteria involved non-mentalization based interventions and research outside the 6-18 age range. The risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment Tools from the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data were synthesized narratively due to the heterogeneity of study designs and outcomes. Of the 5,250 articles screened, 21 studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising over 7,500 participants. The reviewed interventions targeted various aspects of mentalizing, such as emotion-understanding, empathy, perspective-taking, and Theory of Mind. Significant improvements were found in social-cognitive abilities, emotion regulation, and mental health outcomes, including reductions in disruptive behaviours. Interventions that combined mentalizing training for both students and teachers showed promising results. However, the long-term sustainability of these benefits remains unclear. Limitations of the reviewed studies include the lack of control groups, small sample sizes, and variations in outcome measures. The findings highlight the potential of MBIs as a promising approach to fostering socio-emotional competence, positive behaviour, and well-being in school-aged children. Future research should aim to establish the active components and optimal delivery of these interventions through well-designed randomized controlled trials with larger, more diverse samples and extended follow-up periods. The integration of MBIs within educational systems holds promise for promoting resilience and positive mental health outcomes in young people. Embedding MBIs within school curriculums and evaluating cost-effectiveness are important next steps to guide widespread implementation.
基于心理化的干预措施(MBIs)已越来越多地应用于学校环境中,以支持儿童和青少年的社会情感发展和心理健康。本系统综述旨在综合关于在教育背景下对6至18岁学生实施MBIs有效性的证据。从数据库创建到2023年10月,在PsychInfo、MEDLINE、EMBASE、Web of Science和ERIC数据库中进行了全面检索。检索策略结合了与心理化、校本干预措施和目标年龄组相关的术语。该综述方案已在PROSPERO(CRD42022302757)注册。纳入标准包括英文的同行评审出版物、1980年至2023年发表的研究、基于心理化原则的干预措施以及主要关注6至18岁儿童。排除标准包括非基于心理化的干预措施以及6 - 18岁年龄范围之外的研究。使用美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)的质量评估工具评估偏倚风险。由于研究设计和结果的异质性,对数据进行了叙述性综合。在筛选的5250篇文章中,21项研究符合纳入标准,涉及超过7500名参与者。所审查的干预措施针对心理化的各个方面,如情绪理解、同理心、换位思考和心理理论。在社会认知能力、情绪调节和心理健康结果方面发现了显著改善,包括破坏性行为的减少。对学生和教师都进行心理化训练的干预措施显示出有希望的结果。然而,这些益处的长期可持续性仍不明确。所审查研究的局限性包括缺乏对照组、样本量小以及结果测量的差异。研究结果突出了MBIs作为一种有前景的方法在培养学龄儿童社会情感能力、积极行为和幸福感方面的潜力。未来的研究应旨在通过设计良好的随机对照试验,采用更大、更多样化的样本和更长的随访期,确定这些干预措施的有效成分和最佳实施方式。将MBIs整合到教育系统中有望促进年轻人的复原力和积极的心理健康结果。将MBIs纳入学校课程并评估成本效益是指导广泛实施的重要下一步。