Quilici Sibilia, Chancellor Jeremy, Löthgren Mickael, Simon Dominique, Said Gérard, Le Trong Kim, Garcia-Cebrian Ana, Monz Brigitta
Health Economics & Outcomes Research, Uxbridge, UK.
BMC Neurol. 2009 Feb 10;9:6. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-9-6.
Few direct head-to-head comparisons have been conducted between drugs for the treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP). Approved or recommended drugs in this indication include duloxetine (DLX), pregabalin (PGB), gabapentin (GBP) and amitriptyline (AMT). We conducted an indirect meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and tolerability of DLX with PGB and GBP in DPNP, using placebo as a common comparator.
We searched PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL databases and regulatory websites for randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group or crossover clinical trials (RCTs) assessing DLX, PGB, GBP and AMT in DPNP. Study arms using approved dosages with assessments after 5-13 weeks were eligible. Efficacy criteria were: reduction in 24-hour pain severity (24 h PS) for all three drugs, and response rate (>or= 50% pain reduction) and Patient Global Impression of Improvement/Change (PGI-I/C) for DLX and PGB only. Tolerability criteria included: discontinuation, diarrhoea, dizziness, headache, nausea and somnolence. Direct comparisons versus placebo were conducted with pooled fixed - and random-effects analyses on endpoints reported in at least two studies of each drug. Indirect comparisons were performed between DLX and each of PGB and GBP using Bayesian simulation.
Three studies of DLX, six of PGB, two of GBP and none of AMT met the inclusion criteria. In random-effects and fixed-effects analyses of DLX, PGB and GBP, all were superior to placebo for all efficacy parameters, with some tolerability trade-offs. Indirect comparison of DLX with PGB found no differences in 24 h PS, but significant differences in PGI-I/C, favouring PGB, and in dizziness, favouring DLX were apparent. Comparing DLX and GBP, there were no statistically significant differences.
From the few available studies suitable for indirect comparison, DLX shows comparable efficacy and tolerability to GBP and PGB in DPNP. Duloxetine provides an important treatment option for this disabling condition.
用于治疗糖尿病性周围神经病理性疼痛(DPNP)的药物之间很少进行直接的头对头比较。该适应症的获批或推荐药物包括度洛西汀(DLX)、普瑞巴林(PGB)、加巴喷丁(GBP)和阿米替林(AMT)。我们进行了一项间接荟萃分析,以比较DLX与PGB和GBP在DPNP中的疗效和耐受性,使用安慰剂作为共同对照。
我们在PubMed、EMBASE、CENTRAL数据库和监管网站上搜索了评估DLX、PGB、GBP和AMT治疗DPNP的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组或交叉临床试验(RCT)。使用获批剂量且在5 - 13周后进行评估的研究组符合条件。疗效标准为:所有三种药物的24小时疼痛严重程度(24 h PS)降低,仅DLX和PGB的缓解率(疼痛减轻≥50%)以及患者总体改善/变化印象(PGI - I/C)。耐受性标准包括:停药、腹泻、头晕、头痛、恶心和嗜睡。对每种药物至少两项研究报告的终点进行汇总固定效应和随机效应分析,与安慰剂进行直接比较。使用贝叶斯模拟在DLX与PGB和GBP之间进行间接比较。
DLX的三项研究、PGB的六项研究、GBP的两项研究符合纳入标准,而AMT无一符合。在对DLX、PGB和GBP进行随机效应和固定效应分析时,所有药物在所有疗效参数上均优于安慰剂,但在耐受性方面存在一些权衡。DLX与PGB的间接比较发现,24 h PS无差异,但PGI - I/C存在显著差异,PGB更优,在头晕方面,DLX更优。比较DLX和GBP,无统计学显著差异。
从少数适合间接比较的现有研究来看,DLX在DPNP中的疗效和耐受性与GBP和PGB相当。度洛西汀为这种致残性疾病提供了一种重要的治疗选择。