Abstract
Comparing medical devices, drugs and treatments to find out which are more effective would both cut costs and improve quality. But funding a national office to carry out such research could run into the billions.
摘要
比较医疗设备、药物和治疗方法以找出哪种更有效，既能降低成本又能提高质量。但为一个国家机构提供资金来开展此类研究可能要花费数十亿美元。
相似文献
1
Care to compare?
Hosp Health Netw. 2008 Dec;82(12):38-41, 1.
2
Getting to 'smart' health care.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 Nov-Dec;25(6):w589-92. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.w589. Epub 2006 Nov 7.
3
Technology assessment in healthcare: a review and description of a "best practice" technology assessment process.
Best Pract Benchmarking Healthc. 1997 Nov-Dec;2(6):240-53.
4
Can a center for comparative effectiveness information succeed? Perspectives from a health care company.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 Nov-Dec;25(6):w586-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.w586. Epub 2006 Nov 7.
5
Developing a center for comparative effectiveness information.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 Nov-Dec;25(6):w572-85. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.w572. Epub 2006 Nov 7.
6
A review of the use of health status measures in economic evaluation.
Health Technol Assess. 1999;3(9):i-iv, 1-164.
7
The emerging context for advances in comparative effectiveness assessment.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 Nov-Dec;25(6):w593-5. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.w593. Epub 2006 Nov 7.
8
Critical Appraisal of Health Professions Research.
Radiol Technol. 2016 Jan-Feb;87(3):355-8.
9
Challenges for cost-effectiveness research.
Med Decis Making. 1986 Oct-Dec;6(4):194-8. doi: 10.1177/0272989X8600600402.
10
The evaluation of telemedicine and health services research.
Telemed J E Health. 2005 Jun;11(3):317-28. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2005.11.317.
Zotero 插件