Suppr超能文献

一个比较疗效信息中心能够成功吗?来自一家医疗保健公司的观点。

Can a center for comparative effectiveness information succeed? Perspectives from a health care company.

作者信息

Buto Kathy, Juhn Peter

机构信息

Johnson and Johnson in Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 Nov-Dec;25(6):w586-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.w586. Epub 2006 Nov 7.

Abstract

Comparative information about different approaches to treating a disease or condition plays a critical role in the success of any competitive, market-based health care system in achieving quality and value. To ensure that effectiveness studies will be used to stimulate development of important advances in care and not lead to limits in coverage and treatment options, a comparative effectiveness center needs to demonstrate independence from payers; operate with transparent processes; and coordinate, not duplicate, the requirements of the relevant federal agencies. A fully independent, quasi-governmental center is most likely to produce credible, broadly acceptable findings.

摘要

关于治疗疾病或病症的不同方法的比较信息,对于任何基于市场竞争的医疗保健系统在实现质量和价值方面的成功都起着关键作用。为确保有效性研究将用于推动护理方面的重要进展,而不会导致保险覆盖范围和治疗选择受到限制,一个比较有效性中心需要证明其独立于支付方;以透明的流程运作;并协调而非重复相关联邦机构的要求。一个完全独立的准政府中心最有可能产生可信且被广泛接受的研究结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验