Zimiles Herbert
Arizona State University, USA.
Am Psychol. 2009 Jan;64(1):51. doi: 10.1037/a0013717.
Comments on the article "Doctoral training in statistics, measurement, and methodology in psychology: Replication and extension of Aiken, West, Sechrest, and Reno's (1990) survey of PhD programs in North America" by Aiken, West, and Millsap. The current author asks three questions that are provoked by the comprehensive identification of gaps and deficiencies in the training of quantitative methodology that led Aiken, West, and Millsap to call for expanded graduate instruction resources and programs. This comment calls for greater attention to how advances and expansion in the training of quantitative analysis are influencing who chooses to study psychology and how and what will be studied.
艾肯、韦斯特和米尔萨普对文章《心理学统计、测量与方法论的博士培养：对艾肯、韦斯特、塞克雷斯特和雷诺（1990年）对北美博士项目调查的复制与扩展》的评论。当前作者提出了三个问题，这些问题是由对定量方法论培训中差距和不足的全面识别引发的，正是这些差距和不足促使艾肯、韦斯特和米尔萨普呼吁增加研究生教学资源和项目。本评论呼吁更加关注定量分析培训的进步和扩展如何影响选择学习心理学的人群、学习方式以及学习内容。
