Aiken Leona S, West Stephen G, Millsap Roger E
Arizona State University.
Am Psychol. 2009 Jan;64(1):discussion 51-2. doi: 10.1037/a0014161.
Replies to the comment Ramifications of increased training in quantitative methodology by Herbet Zimiles on the current authors original article "Doctoral training in statistics, measurement, and methodology in psychology: Replication and extension of Aiken, West, Sechrest, and Reno's (1990) survey of PhD programs in North America". The current authors state that in their recent article, they reported the results of an extensive survey of quantitative training in all PhD programs in North America. They compared these results with those of a similar survey conducted 12 years earlier (Aiken, West, Sechrest, & Reno, 1990), and raised issues for the future methodological training of substantive and quantitative researchers in psychology. The authors then respond to Zimiles three questions.
对赫伯特·齐米莱斯（Herbet Zimiles）关于当前作者原文章《心理学统计、测量与方法的博士培训：艾肯、韦斯特、塞克雷斯特和雷诺（1990年）对北美博士项目调查的复制与扩展》中增加定量方法培训的影响的评论的回复。当前作者表示，在他们最近的文章中，他们报告了对北美所有博士项目中定量培训的广泛调查结果。他们将这些结果与12年前进行的类似调查（艾肯、韦斯特、塞克雷斯特和雷诺，1990年）的结果进行了比较，并提出了心理学领域实证研究人员和定量研究人员未来方法培训的相关问题。然后，作者回应了齐米莱斯提出的三个问题。
