Sio Ut Na, Ormerod Thomas C
Department of Psychology, Lancaster University, UK.
Psychol Bull. 2009 Jan;135(1):94-120. doi: 10.1037/a0014212.
A meta-analytic review of empirical studies that have investigated incubation effects on problem solving is reported. Although some researchers have reported increased solution rates after an incubation period (i.e., a period of time in which a problem is set aside prior to further attempts to solve), others have failed to find effects. The analysis examined the contributions of moderators such as problem type, presence of solution-relevant or misleading cues, and lengths of preparation and incubation periods to incubation effect sizes. The authors identified a positive incubation effect, with divergent thinking tasks benefiting more than linguistic and visual insight tasks from incubation. Longer preparation periods gave a greater incubation effect, whereas filling an incubation period with high cognitive demand tasks gave a smaller incubation effect. Surprisingly, low cognitive demand tasks yielded a stronger incubation effect than did rest during an incubation period when solving linguistic insight problems. The existence of multiple types of incubation effect provides evidence for differential invocation of knowledge-based vs. strategic solution processes across different classes of problem, and it suggests that the conditions under which incubation can be used as a practical technique for enhancing problem solving must be designed with care.
本文报告了一项对研究酝酿效应(即解决问题前将问题搁置一段时间)对问题解决影响的实证研究的元分析综述。尽管一些研究人员报告称,经过酝酿期后解决问题的成功率有所提高,但其他研究人员并未发现这种效应。该分析考察了调节因素的作用,如问题类型、是否存在与解决方案相关或具有误导性的线索,以及准备期和酝酿期的时长对酝酿效应大小的影响。作者发现了正向的酝酿效应,发散性思维任务比语言和视觉洞察力任务从酝酿中获益更多。较长的准备期会产生更大的酝酿效应,而在酝酿期安排高认知需求任务则会产生较小的酝酿效应。令人惊讶的是,在解决语言洞察力问题时,低认知需求任务在酝酿期产生的酝酿效应比休息更强。多种类型酝酿效应的存在为不同类别问题中基于知识与策略性解决过程的差异调用提供了证据,这表明将酝酿用作提高问题解决能力的实用技术时,其使用条件必须谨慎设计。