Dobbels Fabienne, Van Gelder Frank, Remans Kathleen, Verkinderen Ann, Peeters Jos, Pirenne Jacques, Nevens Frederik
Center for Health Services and Nursing Research, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Clin Transplant. 2009 Jun-Jul;23(3):375-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2009.00955.x. Epub 2009 Feb 6.
Belgian politicians submitted a proposal to rescind the law on anonymity of organ donation and transplantation and facilitate contact between donor families and recipients. It remains uncertain if recipients support this proposal.
One liver transplant patient organization (n = 176/249) answered and provided comments on two questions: (i) how satisfied are you with the current principle of anonymity of the identity of the donor and (ii) the law about anonymity should be changed to allow the donor family and the patient to meet.
Seventy percent were satisfied/very satisfied with the present law, because of anxiety for emotional involvement or feeling obliged to do something in return, feelings of guilt, and out of mutual respect. Nineteen percent was dissatisfied/very dissatisfied and want to obtain some information about the donor, and directly express their gratitude. Forty-two percent disagreed with a change, because of anxiety for manipulation, feelings of guilt, respect for the privacy, and worry about the donor having a different background. Thirty-six percent wanted to change the law out of curiosity, to express their gratitude, or to facilitate their coping process.
Prudence to change the law is warranted, as only a minority of patients are in favor of rescinding the anonymity.
比利时政治家提交了一项提案,旨在废除器官捐赠和移植匿名法,并促进捐赠者家属与接受者之间的联系。接受者是否支持该提案仍不确定。
一个肝移植患者组织(n = 176/249)回答了两个问题并提供了评论:(i)你对当前捐赠者身份匿名原则有多满意,以及(ii)关于匿名的法律应该修改,以允许捐赠者家属与患者见面。
70%的人对现行法律满意/非常满意,原因包括担心情感卷入、觉得有义务回报、内疚感以及相互尊重。19%的人不满意/非常不满意,希望获得有关捐赠者的一些信息,并直接表达他们的感激之情。42%的人不同意改变,原因包括担心被操纵、内疚感、尊重隐私以及担心捐赠者有不同背景。36%的人出于好奇、表达感激或促进自身应对过程而希望修改法律。
改变法律需谨慎,因为只有少数患者赞成废除匿名制。