Rocca Paola, Montemagni Cristiana, Castagna Filomena, Giugiario Michela, Scalese Mara, Bogetto Filippo
Department of Neuroscience, Unit of Psychiatry, University of Turin, via Cherasco 11, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2009 Mar 17;33(2):373-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2009.01.002. Epub 2009 Jan 11.
The purpose of this study was to examine the relative contributions of antipsychotic medication, negative symptoms and executive functions to impairment in social functioning in a sample of outpatients with stable schizophrenia. One-hundred and sixty-eight consecutive outpatients with stable schizophrenia were enrolled in a cross-sectional study. We performed a path analysis using multiple regression technique in order to assess the specific effect of antipsychotic type (first-generation antipsychotics versus second-generation antipsychotics) on social functioning and the possible mediating role of executive functions and negative symptoms. Our findings suggested that (i) second generation antipsychotics (SGAs) use predicted better social functioning (Beta=.24, p=.003) and better executive functions (Beta=.25, p=.003); conversely SGAs use was not associated with lesser negative symptoms (Beta=.00, p=.981); (ii) impaired executive functions and severity of negative symptoms were associated with worse social functioning (Beta=.19, p=.016; Beta=.28, p=.001); (iii) when we inserted in the model Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale - Negative Symptom subscale (PANSS-N) and Wisconsin Card Sorting Test - number of achieved sorting categories (WCST-cat), the former failed to show a mediation effect, while the latter seemed to mediate partially the effect of SGAs on social functioning. Taken together, the present results suggest that it is critical to examine individually executive functions and negative symptoms because they seem to relate to social functioning in different and independent ways and thus might represent separable treatment targets. Furthermore, social functioning appears a complex outcome multiply determined with no single predictor variable explaining a sufficient amount of variance.
本研究的目的是在一组病情稳定的精神分裂症门诊患者样本中,考察抗精神病药物、阴性症状及执行功能对社会功能损害的相对影响。168例连续入选的病情稳定的精神分裂症门诊患者参与了一项横断面研究。我们运用多元回归技术进行路径分析,以评估抗精神病药物类型(第一代抗精神病药物与第二代抗精神病药物)对社会功能的特定影响,以及执行功能和阴性症状可能的中介作用。我们的研究结果表明:(i)使用第二代抗精神病药物(SGA)预示着更好的社会功能(β = 0.24,p = 0.003)和更好的执行功能(β = 0.25,p = 0.003);相反,使用SGA与较少的阴性症状无关(β = 0.00,p = 0.981);(ii)执行功能受损和阴性症状的严重程度与较差的社会功能相关(β = 0.19,p = 0.016;β = 0.28,p = 0.001);(iii)当我们将阳性和阴性症状量表 - 阴性症状分量表(PANSS - N)和威斯康星卡片分类测验 - 完成分类数(WCST - cat)纳入模型时,前者未显示出中介效应,而后者似乎部分中介了SGA对社会功能的影响。综上所述,目前的结果表明,单独考察执行功能和阴性症状至关重要,因为它们似乎以不同且独立的方式与社会功能相关,因此可能代表可分离的治疗靶点。此外,社会功能似乎是一个由多种因素共同决定的复杂结果,没有单一的预测变量能够解释足够多的方差。