Baattrup-Pedersen Annette, Kristensen Esben Astrup, Jørgensen Joan, Skriver Jens, Kronvang Brian, Andersen Hans Estrup, Hoffman Carl Christian, Kjellerup Larsen Lars M
Department of Freshwater Ecology, National Environmental Research Institute, Aarhus University, Vejlsøvej 25, P.O. Box 314, DK 8600 Silkeborg, Denmark.
J Environ Monit. 2009 Feb;11(2):344-52. doi: 10.1039/b808779b. Epub 2008 Nov 19.
An important step in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive is to define and characterize the natural status, designated as the reference condition (RC). Here we present the results of a type-specific screening for reference stream sites in Denmark using two different approaches. First, we performed a screening applying physicochemical, hydro-morphological and pressure criteria at the catchment, reach and site level of a total of 128 sites a priori selected by the regional water authorities as representing the best sites in Denmark. Second, we performed a GIS screening of all mapped streams in Denmark (26,000 km representing app. 90% of all Danish streams) using solely land use characteristics in the catchment area to target the search for larger stream sites to comply with the WFD requirements of type-specificity. Among the 128 sites we did not find any that fulfilled all criteria applied at the catchment, reach and site level using recommended RC threshold values and only three sites using threshold values that were less strict. Similarly very few km (<1%) of the GIS screened streams fulfilled catchment land use criteria, suggesting that the potential of identifying RC sites in Denmark is very limited. The lack of success in the screening process clearly demonstrates a need for alternative methods to establish RC for Danish streams. We propose a combined approach that includes the development of a guiding image for RC for all the stream biota needed to evaluate the ecological quality. This guiding image should be based on historical data, expert knowledge and investigations in streams situated in countries that are subjected to less intense land use and, at the same time, share both topographical and climatic similarities with Denmark, e.g. the Baltic countries.
实施《水框架指令》的一个重要步骤是定义并描述自然状态,即指定为参考条件(RC)。在此,我们展示了丹麦参考河流站点的特定类型筛选结果,采用了两种不同方法。首先,我们在集水区、河段和站点层面应用物理化学、水文形态学和压力标准进行筛选,总共对128个由区域水务部门事先选定的站点进行筛选,这些站点代表丹麦的最佳站点。其次,我们仅利用集水区的土地利用特征,对丹麦所有已绘制地图的河流(26,000公里,约占丹麦所有河流的90%)进行地理信息系统筛选,以寻找符合《水框架指令》特定类型要求的更大河流站点。在这128个站点中,我们未发现任何一个站点使用推荐的参考条件阈值能满足集水区、河段和站点层面应用的所有标准,只有三个站点使用不太严格的阈值时满足标准。同样,地理信息系统筛选的河流中只有极少公里数(<1%)满足集水区土地利用标准,这表明在丹麦识别参考条件站点的潜力非常有限。筛选过程的失败清楚地表明需要替代方法来为丹麦河流建立参考条件。我们提出一种综合方法,包括为评估生态质量所需的所有河流生物群开发参考条件的指导图像。该指导图像应基于历史数据、专家知识以及对土地利用强度较低且与丹麦具有地形和气候相似性的国家(如波罗的海国家)的河流进行的调查。