• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于最小检验通过霍尔姆方法识别有效且更优的药物组合。

On identifying effective and superior drug combinations via Holm's procedure based on the min tests.

作者信息

Soulakova Julia N

机构信息

Department of Statistics, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA.

出版信息

J Biopharm Stat. 2009;19(2):280-91. doi: 10.1080/10543400802622469.

DOI:10.1080/10543400802622469
PMID:19212880
Abstract

In this paper I consider a problem of identifying all effective and superior drug combinations. I formulate this problem in terms of a family of hypotheses and propose a two-stage method to solve it. The first stage uses individual p-values obtained via the Min tests, whereas Holm's approach is employed in the second stage to draw simultaneous inferences. This procedure is shown to control the family-wise error rate in a strong sense. The performance of the procedure is studied by simulation for different parameter settings. The conclusions of the simulation study are stated in terms of the power, family-wise error rate and lack of power.

摘要

在本文中,我考虑了识别所有有效且更优药物组合的问题。我根据一组假设来阐述这个问题,并提出了一种两阶段方法来解决它。第一阶段使用通过最小检验获得的个体p值,而第二阶段采用霍尔姆方法进行同时推断。结果表明,该程序在很强的意义上控制了族系错误率。通过针对不同参数设置的模拟研究了该程序的性能。模拟研究的结论从功效、族系错误率和功效不足等方面进行了阐述。

相似文献

1
On identifying effective and superior drug combinations via Holm's procedure based on the min tests.基于最小检验通过霍尔姆方法识别有效且更优的药物组合。
J Biopharm Stat. 2009;19(2):280-91. doi: 10.1080/10543400802622469.
2
Resampling-based and other multiple testing strategies with application to combination drug trials with factorial designs.基于重采样和其他多重检验策略及其在具有析因设计的联合药物试验中的应用。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2011 Oct;20(5):505-21. doi: 10.1177/0962280209105655. Epub 2010 Jul 28.
3
Large sample tests for simultaneous comparison to multiple controls in terms of binomial proportions.关于二项比例与多个对照进行同时比较的大样本检验。
J Biopharm Stat. 2013 May;23(3):589-603. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2012.756498.
4
Bonferroni parallel gatekeeping - transparent generalizations, adjusted p -values, and short direct proofs.邦费罗尼平行把关——透明的概括、调整后的p值及简短直接证明
Biom J. 2007 Dec;49(6):917-27. doi: 10.1002/bimj.200610361.
5
A mixture gatekeeping procedure based on the Hommel test for clinical trial applications.一种基于霍梅尔检验的用于临床试验应用的混合守门程序。
J Biopharm Stat. 2011 Jul;21(4):748-67. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2011.551334.
6
A less conservative method to adjust for familywise error rate in neuropsychological research: the Holm's sequential Bonferroni procedure.神经心理学研究中调整家族错误率的一种不那么保守的方法:霍尔姆序贯 Bonferroni 程序。
NeuroRehabilitation. 2013;32(3):693-6. doi: 10.3233/NRE-130893.
7
Angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors and diuretics for hypertension.用于治疗高血压的血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和利尿剂。
N Engl J Med. 2003 Jul 3;349(1):90-3; author reply 90-3.
8
A comparison of outcomes with angiotensin-converting--enzyme inhibitors and diuretics for hypertension in the elderly.老年高血压患者使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和利尿剂的疗效比较。
N Engl J Med. 2003 Feb 13;348(7):583-92. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa021716.
9
Properties of multiple intersection-union tests for multiple endpoints in combination therapy trials.联合治疗试验中多个终点的多重交并检验的性质
J Biopharm Stat. 2001;11(3):125-38. doi: 10.1081/BIP-100107653.
10
Simultaneous confidence regions corresponding to Holm's step-down procedure and other closed-testing procedures.与霍尔姆逐步法及其他封闭检验法相应的同时置信区域。
Biom J. 2008 Oct;50(5):678-92. doi: 10.1002/bimj.200710449.

引用本文的文献

1
Tracking and blocking interdependencies of cellular BRAF-MEK oncokinase activities.追踪和阻断细胞BRAF-MEK癌激酶活性的相互依赖性。
PNAS Nexus. 2023 Jun 5;2(6):pgad185. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad185. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Multimediation Method With Balanced Repeated Replications For Analysis Of Complex Surveys.用于复杂调查分析的平衡重复复制多中介方法。
Struct Equ Modeling. 2019;26(5):678-684. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2018.1559065. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
3
Testing multiple dose combinations in clinical trials.在临床试验中测试多种剂量组合。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2020 Jul;29(7):1799-1817. doi: 10.1177/0962280219871969. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
4
Generalized Confidence Intervals Compatible with the Min Test for Simultaneous Comparisons of One Subpopulation to Several Other Subpopulations.与用于一个亚组与其他几个亚组同时比较的最小检验兼容的广义置信区间。
Commun Stat Theory Methods. 2017;46(19):9441-9449. doi: 10.1080/03610926.2016.1212072. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
5
Expected loss functions as additional measures to assess performance of multiple testing procedures for combination drug dose finding.期望损失函数作为评估联合药物剂量寻找多重检验程序性能的额外度量。
Pharm Stat. 2012 May-Jun;11(3):250-7. doi: 10.1002/pst.542. Epub 2012 Mar 6.