• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

研究同意的自愿性:一个概念模型。

Voluntariness of consent to research: a conceptual model.

作者信息

Appelbaum Paul S, Lidz Charles W, Klitzman Robert

机构信息

College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, USA.

出版信息

Hastings Cent Rep. 2009 Jan-Feb;39(1):30-9. doi: 10.1353/hcr.0.0103.

DOI:10.1353/hcr.0.0103
PMID:19213193
Abstract

A good deal of policy and practice in human subjects research aims to ensure that when subjects consent to research, they do so voluntarily. To date, however, voluntariness and its impairment have been poorly conceptualized and studied. The legal doctrine of informed consent could provide a useful model.

摘要

大量关于人类受试者研究的政策和实践旨在确保当受试者同意参与研究时,他们是自愿这样做的。然而,迄今为止,自愿性及其损害的概念化和研究都很不足。知情同意的法律原则可以提供一个有用的模式。

相似文献

1
Voluntariness of consent to research: a conceptual model.研究同意的自愿性:一个概念模型。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2009 Jan-Feb;39(1):30-9. doi: 10.1353/hcr.0.0103.
2
Voluntariness of consent for research: an empirical and conceptual review.研究同意的自愿性:一项实证与概念性综述。
Med Care. 2002 Sep;40(9 Suppl):V69-80. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000023958.28108.9C.
3
Making informed consent meaningful.让知情同意具有意义。
IRB. 2001 Sep-Oct;23(5):1-5.
4
Does informed consent have an expiry date? A critical reappraisal of informed consent as a process.知情同意书有有效期吗?对作为一个过程的知情同意的批判性重新评估。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2011 Jan;20(1):85-92. doi: 10.1017/S0963180110000642.
5
Expanding the frame of "voluntariness" in informed consent: structural coercion and the power of social and economic context.拓展知情同意中“自愿性”的范畴:结构性强制与社会经济背景的力量
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2013 Dec;23(4):355-79. doi: 10.1353/ken.2013.0018.
6
Social restrictions on informed consent: research ethics and medical decision making.知情同意的社会限制:研究伦理与医疗决策
HEC Forum. 2004 Mar;16(1):38-44. doi: 10.1023/b:hecf.0000031778.43876.28.
7
Rethinking research ethics.反思研究伦理。
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Oct;10(10):19-36. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2010.519233.
8
Protestant perspectives on informed consent (particularly in research involving human participants).新教对于知情同意的观点(尤其在涉及人类受试者的研究中)。
Fordham Urban Law J. 2002 Nov;30(1):187-205.
9
The concept of voluntary consent.自愿同意的概念。
Am J Bioeth. 2011 Aug;11(8):6-16. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2011.583318.
10
Limits of autonomy in biomedical ethics?: conceptual clarifications.生物医学伦理学中的自主性限度?:概念阐释
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2011 Oct;20(4):524-32. doi: 10.1017/S0963180111000260.

引用本文的文献

1
Attitudes and awareness in autonomous decision on medical treatment or inclusion in clinical trials amongst Slovenian adolescents: an online survey.斯洛文尼亚青少年在医疗自主决策或参与临床试验方面的态度和意识:一项在线调查。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Oct 23;24(1):1198. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06164-w.
2
Voluntariness of consent in paediatric HIV clinical trials: a mixed-methods, cross-sectional study of participants in the CHAPAS-4 and ODYSSEY trials in Uganda.儿科艾滋病毒临床试验中同意的自愿性:对乌干达CHAPAS - 4和奥德赛试验参与者的混合方法横断面研究
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 1;14(3):e077546. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077546.
3
Social Determinants of Health and Informed Consent Comprehension for Pediatric Cancer Clinical Trials.
健康的社会决定因素与儿科癌症临床试验中的知情同意理解。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Dec 1;6(12):e2346858. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.46858.
4
FAIR BENEFITS AND ITS CRITICS: WHO IS RIGHT?公平受益及其批评者:谁是正确的?
J Health Care Law Policy. 2017;20(1).
5
A response to Al et al. Trials 2023;24:233.对 Al 等人的回应。试验 2023;24:233.
Trials. 2023 Aug 13;24(1):525. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07574-9.
6
Guardians and research staff experiences and views about the consent process in hospital-based paediatric research studies in urban Malawi: A qualitative study.监护人及研究人员对马拉维城市医院儿科研究中知情同意过程的经验和看法:一项定性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Dec 5;23(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00865-x.
7
Deceiving Research Participants: Is It Inconsistent With Valid Consent?欺骗研究参与者:是否与有效同意不一致?
J Med Philos. 2022 Nov 5;47(4):558-571. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhac014.
8
Disparities in Pediatric Oncology: The 21st Century Opportunity to Improve Outcomes for Children and Adolescents With Cancer.儿科肿瘤学的差异:改善癌症儿童和青少年结局的 21 世纪机遇。
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2021 Jun;41:e315-e326. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_320499.
9
Assessment of Factors Associated With Parental Perceptions of Voluntary Decisions About Child Participation in Leukemia Clinical Trials.评估与父母对儿童参与白血病临床试验的自愿决策相关的因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e219038. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.9038.
10
Treatment Search Fatigue and Informed Consent.治疗搜索疲劳与知情同意。
AJOB Neurosci. 2021 Jan;12(1):77-79. doi: 10.1080/21507740.2020.1866115.