Alexandrescu V, Hubermont G, Philips Y, Guillaumie B, Ngongang Ch, Coessens V, Vandenbossche P, Coulon M, Ledent G, Donnay J-C
Department of Surgery, Princesse Paola Hospital, Marche-en-Famenne, Belgium.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009 Apr;37(4):448-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2008.12.005. Epub 2009 Feb 11.
This study aims to assess the patency, the clinical success and the limb-salvage rates of combined subintimal (SA) coupled to endoluminal angioplasty (EA) as the initial treatment of ischaemic inferior-limb ulcers in diabetic patients and to study the influence of other concurrent factors in the tissue-healing process.
Since September 2002 until December 2007, a consecutive series of 176 limbs with manifold ischaemic wounds in 161 diabetic patients were treated by associated multilevel angioplasties in a multidisciplinary 'diabetic-foot team' (a third-line diabetic-care institution integrating two departmental hospitals). There were 98 associated SA with EA procedures, 26 re-vascularisations by single SA technique and 52 others including selective multilevel EAs that were retrospectively reviewed. The mean follow-up period was 22.1 months (in the range of 1-50 months) by clinical and duplex evaluation (every 6 months).
The initial technical success was noted in 149 limbs (84%). For the single or associated SA procedures, 102 of 124 procedures were successful (82%) and 145 of 150 of the miscellaneous EAs (96%) evinced an equally favourable outcome. The 27 initially failed endovascular procedures (22 SA and five EA) required 16 surgical re-vascularisation, eight adjuvant endovascular procedures besides three amputations. A total of 21 secondary and five tertiary angioplasties were equally necessary during the entire follow-up period of these patients. The 30-day survival rate was 99% (one patient died from myocardial infarction). In a intention-to-treat analysis, the cumulative primary and secondary patencies at 12, 24, 36 and 48 months were 62%, 45%, 41% and 38%, together with 80%, 69%, 66% and 66%, respectively. The aggregate clinical success rates at the same intervals were 86%, 77%, 70% and 69%, while the corresponding limb-salvage proportions showed 89%, 83%, 80% and 80%, respectively. The primary patency was negatively affected at 1 and 4 years by the length of the occluded segment (>10 cm) and the end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (p<0.0001). The limb-salvage rates were unfavourably influenced at the same periods by the extent of tissue defects (>3 cm), the ESRD and the presence of osteomyelitis. In addition, at 4 years, the age (>70 years), the accompanying peripheral neuropathy, the bedridden status and the presence of cardiac failure (left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)<30%) appeared equally as negative predictors (p<0.0001) for wound healing and limb rescue.
Primary angioplasty represents a low aggressive and efficacious method to improve the healing process in diabetic ischaemic ulcers. However, beyond appropriate re-vascularisation, even repetitive if necessary, achieving satisfactory limb-salvage rates probably implies a multidisciplinary control of the presenting risk factors for wound healing as well.
本研究旨在评估联合应用内膜下血管成形术(SA)与腔内血管成形术(EA)作为糖尿病患者缺血性下肢溃疡初始治疗方法的通畅率、临床成功率和肢体挽救率,并研究其他并发因素在组织愈合过程中的影响。
自2002年9月至2007年12月,在一个多学科的“糖尿病足团队”(一家整合了两家附属医院的三线糖尿病护理机构)中,对161例糖尿病患者的176条存在多种缺血性伤口的肢体进行了相关的多级血管成形术治疗。其中有98例联合SA与EA手术,26例采用单一SA技术进行血管重建,另外52例包括选择性多级EA,对这些病例进行了回顾性分析。通过临床和双功超声评估(每6个月一次),平均随访期为22.1个月(范围为1 - 50个月)。
149条肢体(84%)获得了初始技术成功。对于单一或联合SA手术,124例手术中有102例成功(82%),150例其他类型的EA中有145例(96%)取得了同样良好的结果。最初27例血管内手术失败(22例SA和5例EA),其中16例需要进行手术血管重建,8例需要辅助血管内手术,另外3例进行了截肢。在这些患者的整个随访期间,共进行了21例二次血管成形术和5例三次血管成形术。30天生存率为99%(1例患者死于心肌梗死)。在意向性治疗分析中,12、24、36和48个月时的累积原发性和继发性通畅率分别为62%、45%、41%和38%,以及80%、69%、66%和66%。相同时间间隔的总临床成功率分别为86%、77%、70%和69%,而相应的肢体挽救比例分别为89%、83%、80%和80%。原发性通畅率在1年和4年时受到闭塞段长度(>10 cm)和终末期肾病(ESRD)的负面影响(p<0.0001)。在相同时间段,肢体挽救率受到组织缺损范围(>3 cm)、ESRD和骨髓炎的不利影响。此外,在4年时,年龄(>70岁)、伴随的周围神经病变、卧床状态和心力衰竭(左心室射血分数(LVEF)<30%)同样是伤口愈合和肢体挽救的负面预测因素(p<0.0001)。
原发性血管成形术是一种低侵袭性且有效的方法,可以改善糖尿病缺血性溃疡的愈合过程。然而,除了适当的血管重建(如有必要甚至可重复进行)外,要获得满意的肢体挽救率可能还意味着对伤口愈合的现有风险因素进行多学科控制。