Suppr超能文献

导管探头胆管外超声检查与传统内镜超声检查在检测胆管结石方面的比较

Catheter probe extraductal ultrasonography vs. conventional endoscopic ultrasonography for detection of bile duct stones.

作者信息

Wehrmann T, Martchenko K, Riphaus A

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Deutsche Klinik für Diagnostik, Wiesbaden, Germany.

出版信息

Endoscopy. 2009 Feb;41(2):133-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1103491. Epub 2009 Feb 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) has been established as a valuable diagnostic tool for the detection of bile duct stones (BDS). The recently introduced extraductal endoscopic ultrasonography (EDUS) using miniprobes has the advantage that it can be performed with a duodenoscope, and if therapeutic interventions become necessary, there is no need to change the scope.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients with acute biliary pain and a dilated bile duct and/or elevated liver function tests, in whom the origin of biliary obstruction could not be identified by US and CT, were enrolled. The patients were investigated with a linear-array echoendoscope, and an additional transduodenal EDUS examination was performed with a 12-MHz miniprobe via the instrumentation channel of the echoendoscope. The presence or absence of BDS was afterwards evaluated by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)/sphincterotomy (EST) and by instrumental bile duct exploration (in the case of a positive EUS/EDUS finding), or by magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and ERCP with additional clinical follow-up (in the case of negative findings on EUS/EDUS).

RESULTS

One hundred and fifty-five patients (55 +/- 12 years old, 98 female) were enrolled. In six cases, the distal bile duct could not be successfully visualized by EDUS, whereas with EUS visualization failed in only one patient ( P = 0.13). Choledocholithiasis was proven in 75 cases (48 %). The diagnostic accuracy of EUS for the detection of BDS (sensitivity 92 %, specificity 100 %, PPV 1.0, NPV 0.93, accuracy 95 %) was comparable to that of EDUS (sensitivity 90 %, specificity 98 %, PPV 0.99, NPV 0.93, accuracy 91 %, P = 0.17 vs. EUS).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients at intermediate risk of BDS it seems to be justified to perform EDUS instead of EUS, and to proceed with ERCP and EST immediately when findings are positive.

摘要

背景与研究目的

内镜超声检查(EUS)已成为检测胆管结石(BDS)的一种有价值的诊断工具。最近推出的使用微型探头的导管外内镜超声检查(EDUS)具有可以通过十二指肠镜进行检查的优势,并且如果需要进行治疗干预,则无需更换内镜。

患者与方法

纳入连续的急性胆绞痛患者,这些患者胆管扩张和/或肝功能检查结果升高,且超声(US)和计算机断层扫描(CT)无法确定胆道梗阻的病因。患者接受线阵超声内镜检查,并通过超声内镜的器械通道使用12兆赫微型探头进行额外的经十二指肠EDUS检查。之后通过内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)/括约肌切开术(EST)以及器械胆管探查(如果EUS/EDUS检查结果为阳性)来评估是否存在BDS,或者通过磁共振胰胆管造影(MRCP)和ERCP以及额外的临床随访(如果EUS/EDUS检查结果为阴性)来评估。

结果

共纳入155例患者(年龄55±12岁,女性98例)。6例患者的远端胆管无法通过EDUS成功观察到,而EUS检查中只有1例患者观察失败(P = 0.13)。75例(48%)患者被证实患有胆总管结石。EUS检测BDS的诊断准确性(敏感性92%,特异性100%,阳性预测值1.0,阴性预测值0.93,准确性95%)与EDUS相当(敏感性90%,特异性98%,阳性预测值0.99,阴性预测值0.93,准确性91%,与EUS相比P = 0.17)。

结论

对于BDS中度风险的患者,似乎有理由进行EDUS而非EUS检查,并且当检查结果为阳性时立即进行ERCP和EST。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验