Suppr超能文献

澳大利亚医学委员会职业行为准则草案:是良好实践还是渐进式威权主义?

The Australian Medical Council draft code of professional conduct: good practice or creeping authoritarianism?

作者信息

Komesaroff Paul A, Kerridge Ian H

机构信息

Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Med J Aust. 2009 Feb 16;190(4):204-5. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2009.tb02744.x.

Abstract

In preparation for a national medical registration system, the Australian Medical Council has proposed a code of conduct ("the Code") that provides a comprehensive description of how doctors should behave. While containing much that will be widely acceptable to doctors, the Code has some major weaknesses: Many of its provisions focus on values and aspirations of a very general nature and will be impossible to enforce. It is based on a narrow, culturally specific view of medicine and ethics that does not reflect the multicultural diversity of Australian society. It confuses the roles of ethics and law in medicine, leading to inappropriate and mistaken injunctions about decision making and responsibilities. In place of the existing, effective, democratic and devolved (if imperfect) system of ethical and professional decision making, it threatens to establish a centralised, authoritarian regime. Because of its limited, ideological view of medicine, its implementation would impoverish medical practice and erode the ability to respond to individual circumstances and needs.

摘要

为筹备全国医疗注册系统,澳大利亚医学委员会提出了一项行为准则(“准则”),该准则全面描述了医生应如何行事。虽然其中许多内容会被医生广泛接受,但该准则存在一些重大缺陷:其许多条款侧重于非常笼统的价值观和抱负,无法执行。它基于对医学和伦理的狭隘、特定文化视角,没有反映澳大利亚社会的多元文化多样性。它混淆了医学中伦理和法律的角色,导致关于决策和责任的不当和错误禁令。它非但没有采用现有的、有效、民主且分散(尽管并不完美)的伦理和专业决策系统,反而有可能建立一个集权、专制的体制。由于其对医学的有限、意识形态化观点,其实施将使医疗实践变得贫乏,并削弱应对个体情况和需求的能力。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验