Suppr超能文献

伦理准则与医疗决策。

Ethics codes and medical decision making.

机构信息

Centre for Studies on Research Integrity, Institute of Law Studies, Polish Academy of Sciences, Nowy Świat 72, 05-077, Warsaw, Poland; Department of Clinical Immunology, Medical University of Warsaw, Nowogrodzka 59, 02-006, Warsaw, Poland.

Institute of Ethics and History of Medicine, Eberhard Karls Universität, Gartenstrasse 47, 72074, Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Jun;104(6):1312-1316. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.10.034. Epub 2020 Nov 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to analyze guidance about medical decision making contained in ethics codes. The primary question we address is which of the main decision-making models - informed decision making (IDM), shared decision making (SDM), or paternalism - is promoted by these codes.

METHODS

We manually searched codes of medical ethics for guidance on medical decision making. Our analysis focused on the major international code, the World Medical Association International Code of Medical Ethics (ICME), and national codes of the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the UK, Ireland, Germany, France and Norway.

RESULTS

The ICME does not promote any specific model of medical decision making. 10 of the 11 analyzed national codes contain guidance about IDM, while only four refer to SDM. Some codes contain articles which are imprecise with regard to the question of medical decision making.

CONCLUSIONS

All of the analyzed national codes should be updated or amended. In particular, given the great importance of SDM in medicine, codes which do not contain relevant guidance should be updated.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Relevant amendments introduced to ethics codes could contribute to promoting of adequate standards of medical decision making (especially those regarding SDM) among doctors.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在分析伦理准则中关于医疗决策的指导意见。我们主要关注的问题是,这些准则提倡哪种主要决策模型——知情决策(IDM)、共享决策(SDM)还是家长主义。

方法

我们手动搜索了医学伦理学准则,以获取关于医疗决策的指导意见。我们的分析重点是主要的国际准则,即世界医学协会国际医学伦理准则(ICME),以及美国、加拿大、澳大利亚、新西兰、英国、爱尔兰、德国、法国和挪威的国家准则。

结果

ICME 不提倡任何特定的医疗决策模型。在分析的 11 个国家准则中,有 10 个包含了关于 IDM 的指导意见,而只有 4 个提到了 SDM。一些准则中的文章在医疗决策问题上不够精确。

结论

所有分析的国家准则都应该进行更新或修订。特别是,鉴于 SDM 在医学中的重要性,那些没有相关指导意见的准则应该进行更新。

实践意义

伦理准则中引入相关修正案,可以有助于促进医生在医疗决策(特别是 SDM 方面)方面达到适当的标准。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验