Suppr超能文献

非酒精性脂肪性肝病:1.5T低翻转角多回波梯度回波磁共振成像的诊断及脂肪分级准确性

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: diagnostic and fat-grading accuracy of low-flip-angle multiecho gradient-recalled-echo MR imaging at 1.5 T.

作者信息

Yokoo Takeshi, Bydder Mark, Hamilton Gavin, Middleton Michael S, Gamst Anthony C, Wolfson Tanya, Hassanein Tarek, Patton Heather M, Lavine Joel E, Schwimmer Jeffrey B, Sirlin Claude B

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego Medical Center, University of California at San Diego, MR3 Laboratory, 408 Dickinson St, San Diego, CA 92103-8226, USA.

出版信息

Radiology. 2009 Apr;251(1):67-76. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2511080666. Epub 2009 Feb 12.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the accuracy of four fat quantification methods at low-flip-angle multiecho gradient-recalled-echo (GRE) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) by using MR spectroscopy as the reference standard.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant prospective study, 110 subjects (29 with biopsy-confirmed NAFLD, 50 overweight and at risk for NAFLD, and 31 healthy volunteers) (mean age, 32.6 years +/- 15.6 [standard deviation]; range, 8-66 years) gave informed consent and underwent MR spectroscopy and GRE MR imaging of the liver. Spectroscopy involved a long repetition time (to suppress T1 effects) and multiple echo times (to estimate T2 effects); the reference fat fraction (FF) was calculated from T2-corrected fat and water spectral peak areas. Imaging involved a low flip angle (to suppress T1 effects) and multiple echo times (to estimate T2* effects); imaging FF was calculated by using four analysis methods of progressive complexity: dual echo, triple echo, multiecho, and multiinterference. All methods except dual echo corrected for T2* effects. The multiinterference method corrected for multiple spectral interference effects of fat. For each method, the accuracy for diagnosis of fatty liver, as defined with a spectroscopic threshold, was assessed by estimating sensitivity and specificity; fat-grading accuracy was assessed by comparing imaging and spectroscopic FF values by using linear regression.

RESULTS

Dual-echo, triple-echo, multiecho, and multiinterference methods had a sensitivity of 0.817, 0.967, 0.950, and 0.983 and a specificity of 1.000, 0.880, 1.000, and 0.880, respectively. On the basis of regression slope and intercept, the multiinterference (slope, 0.98; intercept, 0.91%) method had high fat-grading accuracy without statistically significant error (P > .05). Dual-echo (slope, 0.98; intercept, -2.90%), triple-echo (slope, 0.94; intercept, 1.42%), and multiecho (slope, 0.85; intercept, -0.15%) methods had statistically significant error (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Relaxation- and interference-corrected fat quantification at low-flip-angle multiecho GRE MR imaging provides high diagnostic and fat-grading accuracy in NAFLD.

摘要

目的

以磁共振波谱(MR spectroscopy)作为参考标准,评估在非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)的低翻转角多回波梯度回波(GRE)磁共振(MR)成像中四种脂肪定量方法的准确性。

材料与方法

在这项经机构审查委员会批准且符合健康保险流通与责任法案(HIPAA)的前瞻性研究中,110名受试者(29名经活检证实患有NAFLD,50名超重且有患NAFLD风险,31名健康志愿者)(平均年龄32.6岁±15.6[标准差];范围8 - 66岁)签署知情同意书后接受了肝脏的MR波谱和GRE MR成像检查。波谱检查采用长重复时间(以抑制T1效应)和多个回波时间(以估计T2效应);参考脂肪分数(FF)由经T2校正的脂肪和水的光谱峰面积计算得出。成像检查采用低翻转角(以抑制T1效应)和多个回波时间(以估计T2效应);成像FF通过使用四种复杂度逐渐增加的分析方法计算得出:双回波、三回波、多回波和多干扰。除双回波外的所有方法都对T2效应进行了校正。多干扰方法对脂肪的多个光谱干扰效应进行了校正。对于每种方法,通过估计敏感性和特异性来评估诊断脂肪肝的准确性(以波谱阈值定义);通过使用线性回归比较成像和波谱FF值来评估脂肪分级准确性。

结果

双回波、三回波、多回波和多干扰方法的敏感性分别为0.817、0.967、0.950和0.983,特异性分别为1.000、0.880、1.000和0.880。基于回归斜率和截距,多干扰(斜率0.98;截距0.91%)方法具有较高的脂肪分级准确性,且无统计学显著误差(P > 0.05)。双回波(斜率0.98;截距 - 2.90%)、三回波(斜率0.94;截距1.42%)和多回波(斜率0.85;截距 - 0.15%)方法存在统计学显著误差(P < 0.05)。

结论

在低翻转角多回波GRE MR成像中进行弛豫和干扰校正的脂肪定量在NAFLD中具有较高的诊断和脂肪分级准确性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验