Suppr超能文献

两种不同磁共振扫描仪平台上 MRI 测定质子密度脂肪分数的可重复性。

Reproducibility of MRI-determined proton density fat fraction across two different MR scanner platforms.

机构信息

Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego Medical Center, University of California at San Diego, MR3T Laboratory, San Diego, California 92103-8226, USA.

出版信息

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Oct;34(4):928-34. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22701. Epub 2011 Jul 18.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-determined proton density fat fraction (PDFF) reproducibility across two MR scanner platforms and, using MR spectroscopy (MRS)-determined PDFF as reference standard, to confirm MRI-determined PDFF estimation accuracy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective, cross-sectional, crossover, observational pilot study was approved by an Institutional Review Board. Twenty-one subjects gave written informed consent and underwent liver MRI and MRS at both 1.5T (Siemens Symphony scanner) and 3T (GE Signa Excite HD scanner). MRI-determined PDFF was estimated using an axial 2D spoiled gradient-recalled echo sequence with low flip-angle to minimize T1 bias and six echo-times to permit correction of T2* and fat-water signal interference effects. MRS-determined PDFF was estimated using a stimulated-echo acquisition mode sequence with long repetition time to minimize T1 bias and five echo times to permit T2 correction. Interscanner reproducibility of MRI determined PDFF was assessed by correlation analysis; accuracy was assessed separately at each field strength by linear regression analysis using MRS-determined PDFF as reference standard.

RESULTS

1.5T and 3T MRI-determined PDFF estimates were highly correlated (r = 0.992). MRI-determined PDFF estimates were accurate at both 1.5T (regression slope/intercept = 0.958/-0.48) and 3T (slope/intercept = 1.020/0.925) against the MRS-determined PDFF reference.

CONCLUSION

MRI-determined PDFF estimation is reproducible and, using MRS-determined PDFF as reference standard, accurate across two MR scanner platforms at 1.5T and 3T.

摘要

目的

评估两种磁共振扫描仪平台上磁共振成像(MRI)确定的质子密度脂肪分数(PDFF)的可重复性,并使用磁共振波谱(MRS)确定的 PDFF 作为参考标准,确认 MRI 确定的 PDFF 估计的准确性。

材料与方法

本前瞻性、横断面、交叉、观察性初步研究获得了机构审查委员会的批准。21 名受试者签署了书面知情同意书,并在 1.5T(西门子 Symphony 扫描仪)和 3T(GE Signa Excite HD 扫描仪)上进行了肝脏 MRI 和 MRS 检查。使用具有低翻转角的轴向 2D 扰相梯度回波序列估计 MRI 确定的 PDFF,以最小化 T1 偏差和六个回波时间,以允许校正 T2*和脂肪-水信号干扰效应。使用具有长重复时间的受激回波采集模式序列估计 MRS 确定的 PDFF,以最小化 T1 偏差和五个回波时间,以允许 T2 校正。通过相关分析评估 MRI 确定的 PDFF 的扫描仪间可重复性;分别在每个场强下通过线性回归分析评估准确性,以 MRS 确定的 PDFF 作为参考标准。

结果

1.5T 和 3T MRI 确定的 PDFF 估计值高度相关(r = 0.992)。MRI 确定的 PDFF 估计值在 1.5T(回归斜率/截距= 0.958/-0.48)和 3T(斜率/截距= 1.020/0.925)处均与 MRS 确定的 PDFF 参考值准确。

结论

MRI 确定的 PDFF 估计具有可重复性,并且使用 MRS 确定的 PDFF 作为参考标准,在 1.5T 和 3T 两种磁共振扫描仪平台上均准确。

相似文献

1
Reproducibility of MRI-determined proton density fat fraction across two different MR scanner platforms.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Oct;34(4):928-34. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22701. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
4
Accuracy of multiecho magnitude-based MRI (M-MRI) for estimation of hepatic proton density fat fraction (PDFF) in children.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Nov;42(5):1223-32. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24888. Epub 2015 Apr 3.
8
Accuracy of PDFF estimation by magnitude-based and complex-based MRI in children with MR spectroscopy as a reference.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 Dec;46(6):1641-1647. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25699. Epub 2017 Mar 21.

引用本文的文献

2
Impact of liver graft steatosis on long-term post-transplant hepatic steatosis and fibrosis via magnetic resonance quantification.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jan 17;11:1502055. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1502055. eCollection 2024.
3
Practical approach to quantitative liver and pancreas MRI in children.
Pediatr Radiol. 2025 Jan;55(1):36-57. doi: 10.1007/s00247-024-06133-x. Epub 2025 Jan 6.
4
Quantitative Liver Fat Assessment by Handheld Point-of-Care Ultrasound: A Technical Implementation and Pilot Study in Adults.
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2025 Mar;51(3):475-483. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2024.11.005. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
5
MASLD: What We Have Learned and Where We Need to Go-A Call to Action.
Radiographics. 2024 Nov;44(11):e240048. doi: 10.1148/rg.240048.
7
Associations of gestational diabetes and proton density fat fraction of vertebral bone marrow and paraspinal musculature in premenopausal women.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Jan 16;14:1303126. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1303126. eCollection 2023.
10
MRI proton density fat fraction for estimation of tumor grade in steatotic hepatocellular carcinoma.
Eur Radiol. 2023 Dec;33(12):8974-8985. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09864-x. Epub 2023 Jun 27.

本文引用的文献

1
In vivo characterization of the liver fat ¹H MR spectrum.
NMR Biomed. 2011 Aug;24(7):784-90. doi: 10.1002/nbm.1622. Epub 2010 Dec 12.
2
Estimation of hepatic proton-density fat fraction by using MR imaging at 3.0 T.
Radiology. 2011 Mar;258(3):749-59. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10100659. Epub 2011 Jan 6.
3
Effect of PRESS and STEAM sequences on magnetic resonance spectroscopic liver fat quantification.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009 Jul;30(1):145-52. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21809.
5
Hepatitis C virus, steatosis and lipid abnormalities: clinical and pathogenic data.
Liver Int. 2009 Mar;29 Suppl 2:26-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2008.01950.x.
7
Multiecho MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopy for liver fat quantification.
Radiology. 2008 Dec;249(3):1081. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2493081034.
10
Relaxation effects in the quantification of fat using gradient echo imaging.
Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Apr;26(3):347-59. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2007.08.012. Epub 2008 Feb 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验