• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种不同磁共振扫描仪平台上 MRI 测定质子密度脂肪分数的可重复性。

Reproducibility of MRI-determined proton density fat fraction across two different MR scanner platforms.

机构信息

Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego Medical Center, University of California at San Diego, MR3T Laboratory, San Diego, California 92103-8226, USA.

出版信息

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Oct;34(4):928-34. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22701. Epub 2011 Jul 18.

DOI:10.1002/jmri.22701
PMID:21769986
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4803481/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-determined proton density fat fraction (PDFF) reproducibility across two MR scanner platforms and, using MR spectroscopy (MRS)-determined PDFF as reference standard, to confirm MRI-determined PDFF estimation accuracy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective, cross-sectional, crossover, observational pilot study was approved by an Institutional Review Board. Twenty-one subjects gave written informed consent and underwent liver MRI and MRS at both 1.5T (Siemens Symphony scanner) and 3T (GE Signa Excite HD scanner). MRI-determined PDFF was estimated using an axial 2D spoiled gradient-recalled echo sequence with low flip-angle to minimize T1 bias and six echo-times to permit correction of T2* and fat-water signal interference effects. MRS-determined PDFF was estimated using a stimulated-echo acquisition mode sequence with long repetition time to minimize T1 bias and five echo times to permit T2 correction. Interscanner reproducibility of MRI determined PDFF was assessed by correlation analysis; accuracy was assessed separately at each field strength by linear regression analysis using MRS-determined PDFF as reference standard.

RESULTS

1.5T and 3T MRI-determined PDFF estimates were highly correlated (r = 0.992). MRI-determined PDFF estimates were accurate at both 1.5T (regression slope/intercept = 0.958/-0.48) and 3T (slope/intercept = 1.020/0.925) against the MRS-determined PDFF reference.

CONCLUSION

MRI-determined PDFF estimation is reproducible and, using MRS-determined PDFF as reference standard, accurate across two MR scanner platforms at 1.5T and 3T.

摘要

目的

评估两种磁共振扫描仪平台上磁共振成像(MRI)确定的质子密度脂肪分数(PDFF)的可重复性,并使用磁共振波谱(MRS)确定的 PDFF 作为参考标准,确认 MRI 确定的 PDFF 估计的准确性。

材料与方法

本前瞻性、横断面、交叉、观察性初步研究获得了机构审查委员会的批准。21 名受试者签署了书面知情同意书,并在 1.5T(西门子 Symphony 扫描仪)和 3T(GE Signa Excite HD 扫描仪)上进行了肝脏 MRI 和 MRS 检查。使用具有低翻转角的轴向 2D 扰相梯度回波序列估计 MRI 确定的 PDFF,以最小化 T1 偏差和六个回波时间,以允许校正 T2*和脂肪-水信号干扰效应。使用具有长重复时间的受激回波采集模式序列估计 MRS 确定的 PDFF,以最小化 T1 偏差和五个回波时间,以允许 T2 校正。通过相关分析评估 MRI 确定的 PDFF 的扫描仪间可重复性;分别在每个场强下通过线性回归分析评估准确性,以 MRS 确定的 PDFF 作为参考标准。

结果

1.5T 和 3T MRI 确定的 PDFF 估计值高度相关(r = 0.992)。MRI 确定的 PDFF 估计值在 1.5T(回归斜率/截距= 0.958/-0.48)和 3T(斜率/截距= 1.020/0.925)处均与 MRS 确定的 PDFF 参考值准确。

结论

MRI 确定的 PDFF 估计具有可重复性,并且使用 MRS 确定的 PDFF 作为参考标准,在 1.5T 和 3T 两种磁共振扫描仪平台上均准确。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8da/4803481/b1692aecdd13/nihms764251f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8da/4803481/3a7a08eb26ea/nihms764251f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8da/4803481/a98fde1c15cf/nihms764251f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8da/4803481/592025bae005/nihms764251f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8da/4803481/80ff40be96ef/nihms764251f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8da/4803481/ab9f8b689631/nihms764251f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8da/4803481/b1692aecdd13/nihms764251f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8da/4803481/3a7a08eb26ea/nihms764251f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8da/4803481/a98fde1c15cf/nihms764251f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8da/4803481/592025bae005/nihms764251f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8da/4803481/80ff40be96ef/nihms764251f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8da/4803481/ab9f8b689631/nihms764251f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8da/4803481/b1692aecdd13/nihms764251f6.jpg

相似文献

1
Reproducibility of MRI-determined proton density fat fraction across two different MR scanner platforms.两种不同磁共振扫描仪平台上 MRI 测定质子密度脂肪分数的可重复性。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Oct;34(4):928-34. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22701. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
2
Reproducibility of MR-based liver fat quantification across field strength: Same-day comparison between 1.5T and 3T in obese subjects.基于磁共振成像的肝脏脂肪定量在不同场强下的可重复性:肥胖受试者中1.5T和3T的同日比较
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Sep;42(3):811-7. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24842. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
3
Assessment of a high-SNR chemical-shift-encoded MRI with complex reconstruction for proton density fat fraction (PDFF) estimation overall and in the low-fat range.评估高信噪比的化学位移编码 MRI 结合复杂重建算法,以实现质子密度脂肪分数(PDFF)的整体和低脂肪范围内的准确估计。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Jan;49(1):229-238. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26168. Epub 2018 Apr 29.
4
Accuracy of multiecho magnitude-based MRI (M-MRI) for estimation of hepatic proton density fat fraction (PDFF) in children.基于多回波幅度的磁共振成像(M-MRI)对儿童肝脏质子密度脂肪分数(PDFF)估计的准确性。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Nov;42(5):1223-32. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24888. Epub 2015 Apr 3.
5
Intra- and inter-examination repeatability of magnetic resonance spectroscopy, magnitude-based MRI, and complex-based MRI for estimation of hepatic proton density fat fraction in overweight and obese children and adults.磁共振波谱、基于幅值的磁共振成像以及基于复数的磁共振成像在超重和肥胖儿童及成人中估计肝脏质子密度脂肪分数的检查内及检查间重复性
Abdom Imaging. 2015 Oct;40(8):3070-7. doi: 10.1007/s00261-015-0542-5.
6
Effect of intravenous gadoxetate disodium and flip angle on hepatic proton density fat fraction estimation with six-echo, gradient-recalled-echo, magnitude-based MR imaging at 3T.静脉注射钆塞酸二钠和翻转角对 3T 基于梯度回波、幅度的六回波磁共振成像肝质子密度脂肪分数的影响。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017 Apr;42(4):1189-1198. doi: 10.1007/s00261-016-0992-4.
7
Effect of echo-sampling strategy on the accuracy of out-of-phase and in-phase multiecho gradient-echo MRI hepatic fat fraction estimation.回波采样策略对同反相位多回波梯度回波MRI肝脏脂肪分数估计准确性的影响。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Mar;39(3):567-75. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24193. Epub 2013 May 29.
8
Accuracy of PDFF estimation by magnitude-based and complex-based MRI in children with MR spectroscopy as a reference.基于幅度和基于复数的 MRI 对有磁共振波谱作为参考的儿童 PDFF 估计的准确性。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 Dec;46(6):1641-1647. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25699. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
9
Proton density fat fraction MRI of vertebral bone marrow: Accuracy, repeatability, and reproducibility among readers, field strengths, and imaging platforms.磁共振质子密度脂肪分数成像技术在椎体骨髓中的应用:读者间、场强间和成像平台间的准确性、可重复性和可再现性。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Dec;50(6):1762-1772. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26748. Epub 2019 Apr 13.
10
Accuracy and the effect of possible subject-based confounders of magnitude-based MRI for estimating hepatic proton density fat fraction in adults, using MR spectroscopy as reference.以磁共振波谱为参考,评估基于量级的磁共振成像在估计成人生肝质子密度脂肪分数方面的准确性及可能的基于受试者的混杂因素的影响。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Feb;43(2):398-406. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25006. Epub 2015 Jul 22.

引用本文的文献

1
In-vivo liver proton density fat fraction quantification at 0.55 T: a pilot study with comparison against 3 T MRI.0.55T下肝脏质子密度脂肪分数的活体定量:一项与3T MRI对比的初步研究。
MAGMA. 2025 Jul 15. doi: 10.1007/s10334-025-01277-9.
2
Impact of liver graft steatosis on long-term post-transplant hepatic steatosis and fibrosis via magnetic resonance quantification.通过磁共振定量分析肝移植供肝脂肪变性对移植后长期肝脏脂肪变性和纤维化的影响。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jan 17;11:1502055. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1502055. eCollection 2024.
3
Practical approach to quantitative liver and pancreas MRI in children.

本文引用的文献

1
In vivo characterization of the liver fat ¹H MR spectrum.体内¹H 磁共振波谱对肝脏脂肪的特征分析。
NMR Biomed. 2011 Aug;24(7):784-90. doi: 10.1002/nbm.1622. Epub 2010 Dec 12.
2
Estimation of hepatic proton-density fat fraction by using MR imaging at 3.0 T.使用 3.0T MR 成像估计肝质子密度脂肪分数。
Radiology. 2011 Mar;258(3):749-59. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10100659. Epub 2011 Jan 6.
3
Effect of PRESS and STEAM sequences on magnetic resonance spectroscopic liver fat quantification.PRESS序列和STEAM序列对磁共振波谱法肝脏脂肪定量的影响。
儿童肝脏和胰腺定量磁共振成像的实用方法
Pediatr Radiol. 2025 Jan;55(1):36-57. doi: 10.1007/s00247-024-06133-x. Epub 2025 Jan 6.
4
Quantitative Liver Fat Assessment by Handheld Point-of-Care Ultrasound: A Technical Implementation and Pilot Study in Adults.手持式即时超声定量评估肝脏脂肪:技术实施及成人试点研究
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2025 Mar;51(3):475-483. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2024.11.005. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
5
MASLD: What We Have Learned and Where We Need to Go-A Call to Action.MASLD:我们所学到的和我们需要去的地方——行动呼吁。
Radiographics. 2024 Nov;44(11):e240048. doi: 10.1148/rg.240048.
6
Application and research progress of magnetic resonance proton density fat fraction in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: a comprehensive review.磁共振质子密度脂肪分数在代谢功能障碍相关脂肪性肝病中的应用及研究进展:综述
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Jan;50(1):185-197. doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04448-9. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
7
Associations of gestational diabetes and proton density fat fraction of vertebral bone marrow and paraspinal musculature in premenopausal women.绝经前女性妊娠期糖尿病与椎体骨髓质子密度脂肪分数和椎旁肌肉的相关性。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Jan 16;14:1303126. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1303126. eCollection 2023.
8
The Role of the Multiparametric MRI LiverMultiScan in the Quantitative Assessment of the Liver and Its Predicted Clinical Applications in Patients Undergoing Major Hepatic Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastasis.多参数磁共振成像肝脏多扫描在肝脏定量评估中的作用及其在接受结直肠癌肝转移大肝切除患者中的预测临床应用
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Oct 5;15(19):4863. doi: 10.3390/cancers15194863.
9
Accuracy of attenuation coefficient measurement (ACM) for real-time ultrasound hepatic steatometry: Comparison of simulator/phantom data with magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF).实时超声肝脏脂肪定量中衰减系数测量(ACM)的准确性:模拟器/体模数据与磁共振成像质子密度脂肪分数(MRI-PDFF)的比较。
Heliyon. 2023 Oct 4;9(10):e20642. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20642. eCollection 2023 Oct.
10
MRI proton density fat fraction for estimation of tumor grade in steatotic hepatocellular carcinoma.磁共振质子密度脂肪分数在评估脂肪变性肝细胞癌肿瘤分级中的应用。
Eur Radiol. 2023 Dec;33(12):8974-8985. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09864-x. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009 Jul;30(1):145-52. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21809.
4
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: diagnostic and fat-grading accuracy of low-flip-angle multiecho gradient-recalled-echo MR imaging at 1.5 T.非酒精性脂肪性肝病:1.5T低翻转角多回波梯度回波磁共振成像的诊断及脂肪分级准确性
Radiology. 2009 Apr;251(1):67-76. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2511080666. Epub 2009 Feb 12.
5
Hepatitis C virus, steatosis and lipid abnormalities: clinical and pathogenic data.丙型肝炎病毒、脂肪变性与脂质异常:临床及致病数据
Liver Int. 2009 Mar;29 Suppl 2:26-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2008.01950.x.
6
Quantification of liver fat content: comparison of triple-echo chemical shift gradient-echo imaging and in vivo proton MR spectroscopy.肝脏脂肪含量的定量分析:三回波化学位移梯度回波成像与体内质子磁共振波谱的比较
Radiology. 2009 Jan;250(1):95-102. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2493080217.
7
Multiecho MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopy for liver fat quantification.用于肝脏脂肪定量的多回波磁共振成像和质子磁共振波谱分析
Radiology. 2008 Dec;249(3):1081. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2493081034.
8
Multiecho water-fat separation and simultaneous R2* estimation with multifrequency fat spectrum modeling.基于多频脂肪谱模型的多回波水脂分离及同步R2*值估计
Magn Reson Med. 2008 Nov;60(5):1122-34. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21737.
9
Comparative MR study of hepatic fat quantification using single-voxel proton spectroscopy, two-point dixon and three-point IDEAL.使用单体素质子磁共振波谱、两点Dixon法和三点迭代分解水脂分离迭代水脂分离(IDEAL)技术对肝脏脂肪定量的磁共振对比研究
Magn Reson Med. 2008 Mar;59(3):521-7. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21561.
10
Relaxation effects in the quantification of fat using gradient echo imaging.使用梯度回波成像进行脂肪定量时的弛豫效应。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Apr;26(3):347-59. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2007.08.012. Epub 2008 Feb 21.