Jorm Anthony F, Oh Elizabeth
ORYGEN Research Centre, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic, Australia.
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2009 Mar;43(3):183-200. doi: 10.1080/00048670802653349.
The scientific literature on stigma has been confused because there are multiple components of stigma with different correlates. In order to make sense of this confusion, the present review focuses on research on the most commonly measured component: social distance. The review examines measurement of social distance; characteristics of people who desire greater social distance; experiences that affect social distance; characteristics of people that elicit social distance; the effects of psychiatric labelling; the effects of causal explanations for mental disorders; and interventions to reduce social distance. It is concluded that future research on social distance needs to focus on better evaluation of interventions and examine discriminatory and supportive behaviours in real life rather than in hypothetical situations.
关于污名的科学文献一直很混乱,因为污名有多个组成部分,且各有不同的相关因素。为了厘清这种混乱,本综述聚焦于对最常测量的组成部分:社会距离的研究。该综述考察了社会距离的测量;渴望更大社会距离的人群特征;影响社会距离的经历;引发社会距离的人群特征;精神疾病标签的影响;对精神障碍因果解释的影响;以及减少社会距离的干预措施。得出的结论是,未来关于社会距离的研究需要专注于对干预措施进行更好的评估,并考察现实生活而非假设情境中的歧视性和支持性的行为。