Bond University, Queensland, Australia.
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2024 Dec;25(5):3796-3813. doi: 10.1177/15248380241262286. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
Mental Health Professionals (MHP) often harbor strong negative attitudes toward people with a sexual attraction to children, hindering the provision of essential treatment. This reluctance stems from pervasive stigmatization, contributing to mental health issues among people with pedophilia and exacerbating risk factors associated with child sexual abuse. Limited research and small sample sizes in prior studies underscore the need to conduct a meta-analysis, examining the effectiveness of educational interventions as a tool for reducing stigmatization toward people with pedophilia in MHP. Eight studies meeting specific inclusion criteria were identified through a literature search. These criteria included (a) peer-reviewed empirical, (b) quantitative data, (c) a focus on attitudes toward people with pedophilia, (d) a sample of MHP that might come in contact with people with pedophilia (or the general public), (e) the intervention is educational, (f) the educational intervention is based on people with pedophilia, (g) pre- and post-test data, and (h) be written in English. Comparable variables within these studies encompassed dangerousness, social distance, intentionality, deviance, punitiveness, anger, sympathy, and motivation to treat. The intervention significantly improved perceptions of dangerousness ( = 0.65), social distance ( = 0.33), intentionality ( = 0.38), and punitiveness ( = 0.77). However, it showed non-significant effects on deviance ( = 0.22), anger ( = -0.22), sympathy ( = -0.12), and motivation to treat ( = -0.04). These findings indicate that educational interventions can reduce MHP stigmatization toward people with pedophilia, especially with contact-based and sufficiently prolonged interventions.
心理健康专业人员(MHP)常常对具有儿童性吸引力的人持有强烈的负面态度,从而阻碍了必要的治疗。这种不情愿源于普遍的污名化,导致恋童癖者的心理健康问题,并加剧了与儿童性虐待相关的风险因素。先前研究中的研究范围有限且样本量较小,这突显了进行荟萃分析的必要性,以研究教育干预措施作为减少 MHP 对恋童癖者污名化的工具的有效性。通过文献检索,确定了符合特定纳入标准的八项研究。这些标准包括:(a)同行评审的实证研究,(b)定量数据,(c)关注对恋童癖者的态度,(d)可能接触到恋童癖者的 MHP 样本(或普通大众),(e)干预措施是教育性的,(f)教育干预措施基于恋童癖者,(g)前后测试数据,以及(h)用英文书写。这些研究中的可比变量包括危险性、社会距离、意图、偏差、惩罚性、愤怒、同情和治疗动机。干预措施显著改善了对危险性( = 0.65)、社会距离( = 0.33)、意图( = 0.38)和惩罚性( = 0.77)的看法。然而,它对偏差( = 0.22)、愤怒( = -0.22)、同情( = -0.12)和治疗动机( = -0.04)的影响不显著。这些发现表明,教育干预措施可以减少 MHP 对恋童癖者的污名化,尤其是在基于接触和足够长时间的干预措施下。