• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

红色对成就情境中回避行为的影响。

The effect of red on avoidance behavior in achievement contexts.

作者信息

Elliot Andrew J, Maier Markus A, Binser Martin J, Friedman Ron, Pekrun Reinhard

机构信息

Department of Clinical and Social Sciences in Psychology, Meliora Hall, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627, USA.

出版信息

Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2009 Mar;35(3):365-75. doi: 10.1177/0146167208328330.

DOI:10.1177/0146167208328330
PMID:19223458
Abstract

This research tests whether the perception of red in an achievement context evokes avoidance behavior without conscious awareness and also examines the context specificity of the hypothesized red effect. In Experiment 1, participants were briefly shown red or green on the cover of an analogies test that they would ostensibly take (an achievement context) or rate on likability of (a nonachievement context) in an adjacent lab. Those shown red, relative to those shown green, knocked fewer times on the door of the adjacent lab in the achievement context; no red-green difference in knocking was observed in the nonachievement context. In Experiment 2, participants were briefly shown red, green, or gray on the cover of an IQ test that they would ostensibly take. Those shown red moved their body away from the test cover to a greater degree than did those shown green or gray. This research contributes to incipient work on color psychology and to the more established literature on the automatic link between evaluation and behavior.

摘要

本研究测试了在成就情境中对红色的感知是否会在无意识的情况下引发回避行为,同时也检验了假设的红色效应的情境特异性。在实验1中,参与者会在一个类比测试的封面上短暂看到红色或绿色,他们表面上会参加这个测试(成就情境),或者在相邻实验室对其进行喜好程度评分(非成就情境)。在成就情境中,看到红色的参与者相对于看到绿色的参与者,在相邻实验室的门上敲门的次数更少;在非成就情境中,未观察到敲门行为上的红绿色差异。在实验2中,参与者会在一个他们表面上会参加的智商测试的封面上短暂看到红色、绿色或灰色。看到红色的参与者比看到绿色或灰色的参与者将身体从测试封面上移开的程度更大。这项研究为色彩心理学的初步研究以及关于评价与行为之间自动联系的更成熟文献做出了贡献。

相似文献

1
The effect of red on avoidance behavior in achievement contexts.红色对成就情境中回避行为的影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2009 Mar;35(3):365-75. doi: 10.1177/0146167208328330.
2
Color and psychological functioning: the effect of red on performance attainment.颜色与心理功能:红色对绩效达成的影响。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2007 Feb;136(1):154-68. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.136.1.154.
3
Context specificity of implicit preferences: the case of human preference for red.内隐偏好的情境特异性:以人类对红色的偏好为例。
Emotion. 2009 Oct;9(5):734-8. doi: 10.1037/a0016818.
4
A subtle threat cue, heart rate variability, and cognitive performance.微妙的威胁线索、心率变异性与认知表现。
Psychophysiology. 2011 Oct;48(10):1340-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01216.x. Epub 2011 May 12.
5
Mediation of the negative effect of red on intellectual performance.红色对智力表现负面影响的中介作用。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Nov;34(11):1530-40. doi: 10.1177/0146167208323104. Epub 2008 Sep 3.
6
Perception of the color red enhances the force and velocity of motor output.感知红色会增强运动输出的力量和速度。
Emotion. 2011 Apr;11(2):445-9. doi: 10.1037/a0022599.
7
Priority of face perception during subliminal stimulation using a new color-opponent flicker stimulation.使用新型颜色对立闪烁刺激在阈下刺激期间面部感知的优先级
Neurosci Lett. 2006 Jul 10;402(1-2):57-61. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.03.054. Epub 2006 Apr 25.
8
Assessing the role of color cues and people's beliefs about color-flavor associations on the discrimination of the flavor of sugar-coated chocolates.评估颜色线索以及人们对颜色与味道关联的信念在辨别糖衣巧克力味道方面的作用。
Chem Senses. 2008 Jun;33(5):415-23. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjn008. Epub 2008 Feb 28.
9
Color in context: psychological context moderates the influence of red on approach- and avoidance-motivated behavior.情境中的颜色:心理情境调节红色对趋近和回避动机行为的影响。
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40333. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040333. Epub 2012 Jul 11.
10
Fertile green: green facilitates creative performance.肥沃的绿色:绿色有助于创造性表现。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012 Jun;38(6):784-97. doi: 10.1177/0146167212436611. Epub 2012 Mar 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the Space-Calorie Association: Preliminary Evidence from Reaction Time Performance.探索空间与卡路里的关联:来自反应时间表现的初步证据。
Adv Cogn Psychol. 2021 Jun 30;17(2):136-148. doi: 10.5709/acp-0324-4. eCollection 2021.
2
Brain response to color stimuli: an EEG study with nonlinear approach.大脑对颜色刺激的反应:一项采用非线性方法的脑电图研究。
Cogn Neurodyn. 2021 Dec;15(6):1023-1053. doi: 10.1007/s11571-021-09692-z. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
3
Visual Design Cues Impacting Food Choice: A Review and Future Research Agenda.影响食物选择的视觉设计线索:综述与未来研究议程
Foods. 2020 Oct 19;9(10):1495. doi: 10.3390/foods9101495.
4
A Schema-Activation Approach to Failure and Success in Self-Control.一种关于自我控制中失败与成功的图式激活方法。
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 15;11:2256. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02256. eCollection 2020.
5
State and Trait Rumination Effects on Overt Attention to Reminders of Errors in a Challenging General Knowledge Retrieval Task.在具有挑战性的常识性检索任务中,状态性和特质性沉思对错误提示的外显注意力的影响。
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 2;11:2094. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02094. eCollection 2020.
6
Adaptive Effects of Seeing Green Environment on Psychophysiological Parameters When Walking or Running.步行或跑步时观看绿色环境对心理生理参数的适应性影响。
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 12;10:252. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00252. eCollection 2019.
7
Color-encoding visualizations as a tool to assist a nonliterate population in completing health survey responses.颜色编码可视化作为一种工具,帮助非识字人群完成健康调查的回答。
Inform Health Soc Care. 2020 Jan;45(1):31-42. doi: 10.1080/17538157.2018.1540422. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
8
Color preferences in participants with high or low hypnotic susceptibility.高催眠易感性或低催眠易感性参与者的颜色偏好。
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2018 Jan 30;14:393-398. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S154887. eCollection 2018.
9
Do Red and Blue Uniforms Matter in Football and Handball Penalties?足球和手球判罚中,红蓝制服有影响吗?
J Sports Sci Med. 2017 Dec 1;16(4):565-573. eCollection 2017 Dec.
10
Human colour in mate choice and competition.人类在配偶选择和竞争中的肤色因素。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017 Jul 5;372(1724). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0350.