Escorsell A, Ruiz del Arbol L, Planas R, Albillos A, Bañares R, Calès P, Pateron D, Bernard B, Vinel J P, Bosch J
Liver Unit and Endoscopy Unit, Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, Department of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Spain.
Hepatology. 2000 Sep;32(3):471-6. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2000.16601.
Failure to control bleeding and early rebleeding account for the high mortality associated with variceal hemorrhage in cirrhosis. We compared endoscopic sclerotherapy to terlipressin, a drug that effectively controls acute bleeding while reducing in-hospital mortality. This multicenter randomized controlled trial included 219 cirrhotic patients admitted for endoscopy-proven acute variceal bleeding and randomized to receive repeated injections of terlipressin during 6 days (n = 105) or emergency sclerotherapy (n = 114). Success was defined as obtaining control of bleeding (24-hour bleeding-free period during the first 48 hours) and lack of early rebleeding (any further bleeding from initial control to 5 days later) and survival during the study. Both groups were similar at inclusion. Failure rate for terlipressin was 33% and 32% for sclerotherapy (not significant [NS]). Early rebleeding was responsible for 43% and 44% of failures, respectively. This high efficacy was observed in both Child-Pugh class A + B and Child-Pugh class C patients. Both treatments were similar regarding transfusion requirements, in-hospital stay, and 6-week mortality (26 vs. 19 patients). Side effects appeared in 20% of patients receiving terlipressin and in 30% of those on sclerotherapy (P =.06); being serious in 4% and 7%, respectively (NS). In conclusion, terlipressin and sclerotherapy are equally highly effective therapies achieving the initial control of variceal bleeding and preventing early rebleeding. Both treatments are safe, but terlipressin is better tolerated. Therefore, terlipressin may represent a first-line treatment in acute variceal bleeding until the administration of elective therapy, especially in hospitals where a skilled endoscopist is not available 24 hours a day.
未能控制出血和早期再出血是肝硬化静脉曲张出血相关高死亡率的原因。我们将内镜硬化治疗与特利加压素进行了比较,特利加压素是一种能有效控制急性出血并降低住院死亡率的药物。这项多中心随机对照试验纳入了219例因内镜证实为急性静脉曲张出血而入院的肝硬化患者,随机分为在6天内接受重复注射特利加压素组(n = 105)或急诊硬化治疗组(n = 114)。成功定义为实现出血控制(最初48小时内有24小时无出血期)、无早期再出血(从最初控制到5天后无任何进一步出血)以及研究期间存活。两组在纳入时情况相似。特利加压素的失败率为33%,硬化治疗的失败率为32%(无显著差异[NS])。早期再出血分别导致43%和44%的治疗失败。在Child-Pugh A + B级和Child-Pugh C级患者中均观察到了这种高疗效。在输血需求、住院时间和6周死亡率方面(分别为26例和19例患者),两种治疗方法相似。接受特利加压素治疗的患者中有20%出现副作用,接受硬化治疗的患者中有30%出现副作用(P = 0.06);严重副作用分别为4%和7%(无显著差异)。总之,特利加压素和硬化治疗是同样高效的疗法,都能实现静脉曲张出血的初始控制并预防早期再出血。两种治疗方法都很安全,但特利加压素的耐受性更好。因此,在进行择期治疗之前,特利加压素可能是急性静脉曲张出血的一线治疗方法,尤其是在没有24小时随时可用的熟练内镜医师的医院。