Morales G F, Pereira Lima J C, Hornos A P, Marques D L, Costa C S D, Lima Pereira L, Lopes C V, Raymondi R, Marroni C A
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Santa Casa Hospital, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Hepatogastroenterology. 2007 Jan-Feb;54(73):195-200.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic sclerotherapy is considered a first line therapy to stop bleeding from esophageal varices, but acute variceal bleeding is still associated with high risk of rebleeding and death. We compared the use of octreotide with endoscopic sclerotherapy versus sclerotherapy alone to control acute variceal bleeding and prevent rebleeding in patients with cirrhosis.
In a prospective controlled trial, 68 patients with cirrhosis and acute variceal bleeding who underwent emergency sclerotherapy were randomly assigned to receive a continuous infusion of octreotide or placebo for two days. The primary outcome measure was 7-day mortality.
After seven days the overall mortality was 19.1%, and the proportion of patients who died in octreotide group (8 of 40, or 20%) was similar to the placebo group (5 of 28, or 17.85%; p = 0.74). Rebleeding occurred in 20.6% (14 of 68 patients), being 20% (8 of 40) in the octreotide group vs. 21.4% (6 of 28) in the placebo group (p = 0.88). The mean number of units of blood transfused after sclerotherapy was 2.05 units in the octreotide group vs. 2.08 units in the placebo group (p = 0.96). Thirty patients needed intensive care support (20 of 40 in the octreotide group vs. 10 of 28 in the placebo group; p = 0.24). The differences remained without statistical significance even after adjustment for hepatic function and endoscopic bleeding stigmata by a linear regression model analysis test.
In patients with cirrhosis, octreotide intravenous per 48h associated with sclerotherapy is not superior to sclerotherapy alone in terms of 7-day mortality, frequency of rebleeding, number of units of packet red blood cell transfusion and length of stay in intensive care setting.
背景/目的:内镜下硬化治疗被视为食管静脉曲张出血的一线治疗方法,但急性静脉曲张出血仍与再出血及死亡的高风险相关。我们比较了奥曲肽联合内镜下硬化治疗与单纯硬化治疗在控制肝硬化患者急性静脉曲张出血及预防再出血方面的效果。
在一项前瞻性对照试验中,68例接受急诊硬化治疗的肝硬化急性静脉曲张出血患者被随机分配,接受为期两天的奥曲肽持续输注或安慰剂输注。主要结局指标为7天死亡率。
7天后总体死亡率为19.1%,奥曲肽组死亡患者比例(40例中的8例,即20%)与安慰剂组(28例中的5例,即17.85%;p = 0.74)相似。68例患者中有20.6%(14例)发生再出血,奥曲肽组为20%(40例中的8例),安慰剂组为21.4%(28例中的6例)(p = 0.88)。硬化治疗后奥曲肽组平均输血量为2.05单位,安慰剂组为2.08单位(p = 0.96)。30例患者需要重症监护支持(奥曲肽组40例中的20例,安慰剂组28例中的10例;p = 0.24)。即使通过线性回归模型分析测试对肝功能和内镜下出血征象进行调整后,这些差异仍无统计学意义。
对于肝硬化患者,每48小时静脉注射奥曲肽联合硬化治疗在7天死亡率、再出血频率、红细胞输注量及重症监护时长方面并不优于单纯硬化治疗。