Bonshtien Anat L, Parnas Avital, Sharkia Rajach, Niv Adina, Mizrahi Itzhak, Azem Abdussalam, Weiss Celeste
Department of Biochemistry, The George Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv 69778, Israel.
Cell Stress Chaperones. 2009 Sep;14(5):509-19. doi: 10.1007/s12192-009-0104-2. Epub 2009 Feb 18.
In this study, we have investigated the relationship between chaperonin/co-chaperonin binding, ATP hydrolysis, and protein refolding in heterologous chaperonin systems from bacteria, chloroplast, and mitochondria. We characterized two types of chloroplast cpn60 oligomers, ch-cpn60 composed of alpha and beta subunits (alpha(7)beta(7) ch-cpn60) and one composed of all beta subunits (beta(14) ch-cpn60). In terms of ATPase activity, the rate of ATP hydrolysis increased with protein concentration up to 60 microM, reflecting a concentration at which the oligomers are stable. At high concentrations of cpn60, all cpn10 homologs inhibited ATPase activity of alpha(7)beta(7) ch-cpn60. In contrast, ATPase of beta(14) ch-cpn60 was inhibited only by mitochondrial cpn10, supporting previous reports showing that beta(14) is functional only with mitochondrial cpn10 and not with other cpn10 homologs. Surprisingly, direct binding assays showed that both ch-cpn60 oligomer types bind to bacterial, mitochondrial, and chloroplast cpn10 homologs with an equal apparent affinity. Moreover, mitochondrial cpn60 binds chloroplast cpn20 with which it is not able to refold denatured proteins. Protein refolding experiments showed that in such instances, the bound protein is released in a conformation that is not able to refold. The presence of glycerol, or subsequent addition of mitochondrial cpn10, allows us to recover enzymatic activity of the substrate protein. Thus, in our systems, the formation of co-chaperonin/chaperonin complexes does not necessarily lead to protein folding. By using heterologous oligomer systems, we are able to separate the functions of binding and refolding in order to better understand the chaperonin mechanism.
在本研究中,我们研究了伴侣蛋白/共伴侣蛋白结合、ATP水解以及细菌、叶绿体和线粒体的异源伴侣蛋白系统中蛋白质复性之间的关系。我们表征了两种类型的叶绿体cpn60寡聚体,一种由α和β亚基组成的ch-cpn60(α(7)β(7) ch-cpn60),另一种由所有β亚基组成(β(14) ch-cpn60)。就ATP酶活性而言,ATP水解速率随蛋白质浓度增加直至60 microM,这反映了寡聚体稳定的浓度。在高浓度的cpn60下,所有cpn10同源物均抑制α(7)β(7) ch-cpn60的ATP酶活性。相比之下,β(14) ch-cpn60的ATP酶仅被线粒体cpn10抑制,这支持了先前的报道,即β(14)仅与线粒体cpn10起作用,而与其他cpn10同源物不起作用。令人惊讶的是,直接结合测定表明,两种ch-cpn60寡聚体类型均以相等的表观亲和力与细菌、线粒体和叶绿体cpn10同源物结合。此外,线粒体cpn60与叶绿体cpn20结合,但无法使其复性变性蛋白质。蛋白质复性实验表明,在这种情况下,结合的蛋白质以无法复性的构象释放。甘油的存在或随后添加线粒体cpn10,使我们能够恢复底物蛋白的酶活性。因此,在我们的系统中,共伴侣蛋白/伴侣蛋白复合物的形成不一定导致蛋白质折叠。通过使用异源寡聚体系统,我们能够分离结合和复性的功能,以便更好地理解伴侣蛋白机制。