Burkhalter Andreas
Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis, MO, USA.
Front Neurosci. 2008 Dec 15;2(2):155-67. doi: 10.3389/neuro.01.026.2008. eCollection 2008 Dec.
Cortical computations are critically dependent on GABA-releasing neurons for dynamically balancing excitation with inhibition that is proportional to the overall level of activity. Although it is widely accepted that there are multiple types of interneurons, defining their identities based on qualitative descriptions of morphological, molecular and physiological features has failed to produce a universally accepted 'parts list', which is needed to understand the roles that interneurons play in cortical processing. A list of features has been published by the Petilla Interneurons Nomenclature Group, which represents an important step toward an unbiased classification of interneurons. To this end some essential features have recently been studied quantitatively and their association was examined using multidimensional cluster analyses. These studies revealed at least 3 distinct electrophysiological, 6 morphological and 15 molecular phenotypes. This is a conservative estimate of the number of interneuron types, which almost certainly will be revised as more quantitative studies will be performed and similarities will be defined objectively. It is clear that interneurons are organized with physiological attributes representing the most general, molecular characteristics the most detailed and morphological features occupying the middle ground. By themselves, none of these features are sufficient to define classes of interneurons. The challenge will be to determine which features belong together and how cell type-specific feature combinations are genetically specified.
皮质计算严重依赖于释放γ-氨基丁酸(GABA)的神经元,以动态平衡兴奋与抑制,且这种抑制与整体活动水平成正比。尽管人们普遍认为存在多种类型的中间神经元,但基于形态、分子和生理特征的定性描述来定义它们的身份,未能产生一个被普遍接受的“部件清单”,而这是理解中间神经元在皮质处理过程中所起作用所必需的。Petilla中间神经元命名小组已经公布了一份特征清单,这是朝着对中间神经元进行无偏分类迈出的重要一步。为此,最近对一些基本特征进行了定量研究,并使用多维聚类分析检查了它们之间的关联。这些研究揭示了至少3种不同的电生理表型、6种形态表型和15种分子表型。这是对中间神经元类型数量的保守估计,几乎可以肯定,随着更多定量研究的开展以及相似性被客观定义,这个估计将会被修正。很明显,中间神经元的组织方式是,生理属性代表最一般的特征,分子特征最为详细,而形态特征则处于中间位置。就其本身而言,这些特征都不足以定义中间神经元的类别。挑战将在于确定哪些特征属于同一类别,以及细胞类型特异性特征组合是如何通过基因来确定的。