Suppr超能文献

在动态加载的关节内山羊模型中对生物可吸收缝线锚钉和金属缝线锚钉的比较。

A comparison of bioabsorbable and metallic suture anchors in a dynamically loaded, intra-articular caprine model.

作者信息

Bottoni Craig R, Brooks Daniel E, DeBerardino Thomas M, Owens Brett D, Judson Kurt L, Eggers Jeffrey S, Mays Mary Z

机构信息

Aspetar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, PO Box 29222, Doha, Qatar.

出版信息

Orthopedics. 2008 Nov;31(11):1106.

Abstract

Little is known about the in vivo behavior of bioabsorbable suture anchors. A goat model was used to biomechanically and histologically test bioabsorbable and metallic suture anchors in an intra-articular environment at 0, 6, and 12 weeks. Significantly greater force was required to break the bioabsorbable construct than the metallic construct at 0 and 6 weeks. Failure of the metallic anchor constructs occurred at the eyelet. Histological analysis of both bone-anchor interfaces demonstrated equally good osteointegration without evidence of osteolysis. The bioabsorbable suture anchor tested is safe for use in clinical practice without concerns for the strength of the construct or bony reaction to the material.

摘要

关于可生物吸收缝线锚钉的体内行为知之甚少。采用山羊模型,在关节内环境中于0、6和12周时对可生物吸收和金属缝线锚钉进行生物力学和组织学测试。在0周和6周时,破坏可生物吸收结构所需的力明显大于金属结构。金属锚钉结构的失效发生在小孔处。对两个骨锚界面的组织学分析表明,骨整合同样良好,没有骨溶解的迹象。所测试的可生物吸收缝线锚钉在临床实践中使用是安全的,无需担心结构强度或材料对骨的反应。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验