Wüst Daniel M, Meyer Dominik C, Favre Philippe, Gerber Christian
Department of Orthopedics, University of Zürich, Balgrist, Zürich, Switzerland.
Arthroscopy. 2006 Nov;22(11):1146-53. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.06.013.
This study was designed to comprehensively compare the mechanical properties of 4 types of braided polyblend sutures with widely used braided polyester and monofilament polydioxanone sutures.
Polyblend polyethylene sutures (FiberWire [Arthrex, Naples, FL], Herculine [Linvatec, Largo, FL], Orthocord [DePuy Mitek, Raynham, MA], and Ultrabraid [Smith & Nephew Endoscopy, Andover, MA]), a braided polyester suture (Ethibond; Ethicon, Somerville, NJ), and an absorbable monofilament polydioxanone suture (PDS II; Ethicon), all USP No. 2, were mechanically tested. Fraying resistance was tested on eyelets of metallic and absorbable suture anchors. Cartilage abrasion caused by an intra-articularly placed suture knot was simulated by fraying on distal porcine femora.
All polyblend sutures were stronger than Ethibond or PDS II sutures by at least a factor of 2, with or without a knot. When knotted, Herculine (261 +/- 44 N) was strongest, followed by Ultrabraid (244 +/- 3 N). FiberWire was most resistant against fraying on metallic anchors. Orthocord was by far least abrasive with absorbable anchors. Resistance to fraying was 100- to 500-fold (absorbable anchors) and 6- to 30-fold (metallic anchor) better for all polyblend sutures than for Ethibond. All braided sutures caused a similar amount of abrasion of joint cartilage, but they caused significantly more abrasion (>20-fold) than the monofilament degradable suture.
The ultimate strength of polyblend suture material was 2- to 2.5-fold greater than that of polyester or polydioxanone sutures, but the resistance to fraying was up to 500-fold greater than that of polyester or polydioxanone sutures. With regard to strength, this makes polyblend sutures particularly advantageous for use with metallic edges of anchors or prostheses or with absorbable anchor eyelets.
With a high resistance to fraying against metallic edges or a decrease in cutting of absorbable suture eyelets being up to 500-fold greater than with polyester or polydioxanone sutures, the new polyblend sutures appear to fill a void in the armamentarium of the surgeon, provided that at least 2 throws more than with conventional sutures are used for knot tying.
本研究旨在全面比较4种编织聚混物缝线与广泛使用的编织聚酯缝线和单丝聚二氧六环酮缝线的力学性能。
对聚混物聚乙烯缝线(FiberWire[美国佛罗里达州那不勒斯市的Arthrex公司]、Herculine[美国佛罗里达州拉戈市的Linvatec公司]、Orthocord[美国马萨诸塞州雷纳姆市的DePuy Mitek公司]和Ultrabraid[美国马萨诸塞州安多弗市的Smith & Nephew Endoscopy公司])、一种编织聚酯缝线(Ethibond;美国新泽西州萨默维尔市的Ethicon公司)和一种可吸收单丝聚二氧六环酮缝线(PDS II;Ethicon公司)进行力学测试,所有缝线均为美国药典2号规格。在金属和可吸收缝线锚钉的小孔上测试抗磨损性。通过在猪股骨远端进行磨损试验来模拟关节内放置的缝线结引起的软骨磨损。
无论有无打结,所有聚混物缝线的强度均至少比Ethibond或PDS II缝线高2倍。打结时,Herculine(261±44 N)强度最大,其次是Ultrabraid(244±3 N)。FiberWire在金属锚钉上最抗磨损。Orthocord对可吸收锚钉的磨损最小。所有聚混物缝线的抗磨损性比Ethibond高100至500倍(可吸收锚钉)和6至30倍(金属锚钉)。所有编织缝线对关节软骨的磨损量相似,但它们引起的磨损比单丝可降解缝线显著更多(>20倍)。
聚混物缝线材料的极限强度比聚酯或聚二氧六环酮缝线高2至2.5倍,但抗磨损性比聚酯或聚二氧六环酮缝线高500倍。就强度而言,这使得聚混物缝线在与锚钉或假体的金属边缘或可吸收锚钉小孔配合使用时特别有利。
新的聚混物缝线对金属边缘的抗磨损性高,或对可吸收缝线小孔的切割减少量比聚酯或聚二氧六环酮缝线高500倍,前提是打结时比传统缝线至少多打2个结,这似乎填补了外科医生器械库中的一个空白。