Barber F Alan, Coons David A, Ruiz-Suarez Michell
Plano Orthopedic and Sports Medicine Center, Plano, Texas 75093, USA.
Arthroscopy. 2008 Feb;24(2):224-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.08.011. Epub 2007 Nov 5.
The purpose of this study was to compare biodegradable glenoid suture anchors by cyclic loading and load to failure testing.
Seven different suture anchors (BioKnotless and Lupine Loop [DePuy-Mitek, Norwood, MA]; BioPushLock, BioSutureTak, and BioFasTak [Arthrex Corp, Naples, FL]; BioAnchor [Conmed Linvatec, Largo FL]; and BioRaptor [Smith & Nephew, Andover, MA]) were tested in 8 matched pairs of human cadaver fresh-frozen glenoids. The anchors were inserted in rotation into different glenoid rim positions. Sutures attached to the anchors were fixed to an Instron 8871 machine (Instron, Canton, MA) and cyclic loading and destructive testing were performed. The cyclic displacement at 100 and 500 cycles, stiffness, ultimate failure strength, and mode of failure were determined.
No statistical difference was found in the ultimate failure load for any of these anchors. The Lupine Loop and BioAnchor had greater 100 cycle and 500 cycle mean displacements than the BioPushLock and BioSutureTak. The Lupine Loop also had greater 100 cycle and 500 cycle mean displacement than the BioFasTak (P < .05). The BioAnchor had greater mean 500 cyclic displacement than the BioFasTak (P < .05). Mean BioSutureTak stiffness was greater than the Lupine Loop, BioAnchor, BioKnotless, and BioRaptor (P < .05).
No differences in ultimate failure strength after cyclic loading were found in these seven biodegradable glenoid anchors (BioKnotless, Lupine Loop, BioPushLock, BioSutureTak, BioFasTak, BioAnchor, and BioRaptor). Most displacement occurred in the first 100 cycles. Displacement at 500 cycles was greater for the Lupine Loop and the BioAnchor than the BioPushLock, BioSutureTak, and BioFasTak. Failure was principally by the anchor pulling out of bone except for the BioSutureTak, which also failed by the suture loop eyelet pulling out of the anchor body, and the BioPushLock which failed by the suture slipping past anchor.
Biodegradable glenoid anchors did not show statistical difference in ultimate failure load after cyclic loading.
本研究旨在通过循环加载和破坏试验比较可生物降解的肩胛盂缝合锚钉。
在8对匹配的人类尸体新鲜冷冻肩胛盂中测试7种不同的缝合锚钉(BioKnotless和Lupine Loop[DePuy-Mitek,诺伍德,马萨诸塞州];BioPushLock、BioSutureTak和BioFasTak[Arthrex公司,那不勒斯,佛罗里达州];BioAnchor[Conmed Linvatec,拉戈,佛罗里达州];以及BioRaptor[史赛克公司,安多弗,马萨诸塞州])。将锚钉旋转插入肩胛盂边缘的不同位置。连接到锚钉的缝线固定在Instron 8871机器(Instron,坎顿,马萨诸塞州)上,并进行循环加载和破坏试验。测定100次和500次循环时的循环位移、刚度、极限破坏强度和破坏模式。
这些锚钉中的任何一种在极限破坏载荷方面均未发现统计学差异。Lupine Loop和BioAnchor在100次和500次循环时的平均位移大于BioPushLock和BioSutureTak。Lupine Loop在100次和500次循环时的平均位移也大于BioFasTak(P<.05)。BioAnchor在500次循环时的平均位移大于BioFasTak(P<.05)。BioSutureTak的平均刚度大于Lupine Loop、BioAnchor、BioKnotless和BioRaptor(P<.05)。
在这七种可生物降解的肩胛盂锚钉(BioKnotless、Lupine Loop、BioPushLock、BioSutureTak、BioFasTak、BioAnchor和BioRaptor)中,循环加载后极限破坏强度没有差异。大多数位移发生在最初的100次循环中。Lupine Loop和BioAnchor在500次循环时的位移大于BioPushLock、BioSutureTak和BioFasTak。除BioSutureTak(其也因缝线环孔从锚钉主体中拔出而失效)和BioPushLock(其因缝线滑过锚钉而失效)外,主要失效方式是锚钉从骨中拔出。
可生物降解的肩胛盂锚钉在循环加载后的极限破坏载荷方面未显示出统计学差异。