Suppr超能文献

肩部区域关节的被动活动加上建议和锻炼,并不比单纯的建议和锻炼更能减轻疼痛和残疾:一项随机试验。

Passive mobilisation of shoulder region joints plus advice and exercise does not reduce pain and disability more than advice and exercise alone: a randomised trial.

作者信息

Chen Judy F, Ginn Karen A, Herbert Robert D

机构信息

Physiotherapy Department, The Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia.

出版信息

Aust J Physiother. 2009;55(1):17-23. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(09)70056-x.

Abstract

QUESTION

Is the addition of passive mobilisation of shoulder region joints to advice and exercise for patients with shoulder pain and stiffness more effective than advice and exercise alone?

DESIGN

Randomised trial with concealed allocation, assessor blinding, and intention-to-treat analysis.

PARTICIPANTS

90 people who had shoulder pain and stiffness for more than one month.

INTERVENTION

All participants received advice and exercise. The experimental group also received passive joint mobilisation of shoulder region joints.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcome measures included pain and disability measured with the 13-point Shoulder Pain and Disability Index. Secondary outcome measures were self-perceived global improvement measured on a 6-point scale and active ranges of motion. Subjects received a maximum of 10 sessions of therapy. Outcome measurements were taken at baseline, one month, and six months.

RESULTS

The experimental group had 3% (95% CI -5 to 11) less pain and disability than the control group at one month and 1% (95% CI -13 to 16) less pain at six months, which are statistically nonsignificant. Their global perceived effect was 0.1 out of 5 (95% CI -0.2 to 0.4) worse than the control group at one month and 0.1 (95% CI -0.5 to 0.7) better at 6 months, which are also statistically non-significant. Differences between groups in all range of motion measures were small and statistically non-significant.

CONCLUSION

The addition of passive joint mobilisation of shoulder region joints is not more effective than advice and exercise alone for shoulder pain and stiffness.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ACTRN 12605000080628.

摘要

问题

对于肩痛和僵硬患者,在给予建议和锻炼的基础上增加肩部区域关节的被动活动,是否比单纯的建议和锻炼更有效?

设计

采用隐藏分配、评估者盲法和意向性分析的随机试验。

参与者

90名肩痛和僵硬超过一个月的患者。

干预措施

所有参与者均接受建议和锻炼。实验组还接受肩部区域关节的被动关节活动。

观察指标

主要观察指标包括用13分制肩部疼痛和残疾指数测量的疼痛和残疾情况。次要观察指标是用6分制测量的自我感知整体改善情况以及主动活动范围。受试者最多接受10次治疗。在基线、1个月和6个月时进行观察指标测量。

结果

实验组在1个月时疼痛和残疾程度比对照组少3%(95%可信区间为-5至11),在6个月时疼痛少1%(95%可信区间为-13至16),这些差异无统计学意义。他们的整体感知效果在1个月时比对照组差0.1(满分5分,95%可信区间为-0.2至0.4),在6个月时比对照组好0.1(95%可信区间为-0.5至0.7),这些差异也无统计学意义。两组在所有活动范围测量指标上的差异都很小且无统计学意义。

结论

对于肩痛和僵硬,增加肩部区域关节的被动关节活动并不比单纯的建议和锻炼更有效。

试验注册

ACTRN 12605000080628。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验