Vinuesa-Montoya Sergio, Aguilar-Ferrándiz María Encarnación, Matarán-Peñarrocha Guillermo A, Fernández-Sánchez Manuel, Fernández-Espinar Elena María, Castro-Sánchez Adelaida María
Andalusian Health Service, ZBS Roquetas de Mar, Physiotherapy Service, Almeria, Andalucía, Spain.
Department of Physical Therapy, University of Granada, Granada, Andalucía, Spain.
J Chiropr Med. 2017 Jun;16(2):85-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.10.002. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
The purpose of this study was to investigate changes in pain, disability, and range of movement after cervicothoracic manipulation plus exercise therapy in individuals with unilateral shoulder impingement syndrome.
Forty-one patients (30 men, 11 women; aged 47 ± 9) diagnosed with unilateral shoulder impingement syndrome attended 10 sessions for 5 weeks (2 sessions/wk). Eligible patients were randomly allocated to 2 study groups: cervicothoracic manipulation plus exercise therapy (n = 21) or home exercise program (n = 20). The outcomes measures included the visual analog scale (VAS); the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score; Shoulder Disability Questionnaire; subacromial impingement syndrome (Hawkins-Kennedy Test and Neer Test); and shoulder active range of motion (movements of flexion, extension, rotation, adduction, and abduction). Assessments were applied at baseline and 24 hours after completing 5 weeks of related interventions.
After 5 weeks of treatment significant between-group differences were observed in the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score ( = .012); however, no statistically significant differences were achieved for Shoulder Disability Questionnaire ( = .061) and pain intensity ( = .859). Both groups improved with regard to disability and clinical tests for detecting subacromial impingement syndrome.
This clinical trial suggests that cervicothoracic manipulative treatment with mobilization plus exercise therapy may improve intensity of pain and range of motion compared with the home exercise group alone; the home exercise group had significant changes for flexion, extension, adduction, and abduction, but not for external and internal rotation movement in patients with shoulder impingement.
本研究旨在调查单侧肩峰撞击综合征患者接受颈胸段手法治疗加运动疗法后疼痛、功能障碍及活动范围的变化。
41例被诊断为单侧肩峰撞击综合征的患者(30例男性,11例女性;年龄47±9岁)参加了为期5周、每周2次、共10节的治疗。符合条件的患者被随机分为2个研究组:颈胸段手法治疗加运动疗法组(n = 21)和家庭运动计划组(n = 20)。结局指标包括视觉模拟量表(VAS);手臂、肩部和手部功能障碍评分;肩部功能障碍问卷;肩峰下撞击综合征(霍金斯-肯尼迪试验和尼尔试验);以及肩部主动活动范围(前屈、后伸、旋转、内收和外展运动)。在基线时以及完成5周相关干预后24小时进行评估。
治疗5周后,在手臂、肩部和手部功能障碍评分方面观察到显著的组间差异(P = .012);然而,肩部功能障碍问卷(P = .061)和疼痛强度(P = .859)未达到统计学显著差异。两组在功能障碍和检测肩峰下撞击综合征的临床测试方面均有改善。
这项临床试验表明,与单纯家庭运动组相比,颈胸段手法治疗联合运动疗法可能会改善疼痛强度和活动范围;家庭运动组在肩部撞击患者的前屈、后伸、内收和外展方面有显著变化,但在外旋和内旋运动方面没有变化。