University of Alberta, School of Public Health, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
University of Alberta, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 29;19(4):e0294014. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294014. eCollection 2024.
Exercise therapy (ET) is frequently an early treatment of choice when managing shoulder pain, yet evidence on its efficacy to expedite recovery is inconsistent. Moreover, the value of adding adjunct therapies (i.e. injections, manual therapy, electrotherapy) to ET is currently unclear. This study combined both direct and indirect evidence across studies on the effectiveness of ET with/without adjunct therapies compared to usual medical care for adults with chronic shoulder pain.
Using a network meta-analysis, randomized control trials comparing ET along with adjunct therapies were identified in MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Sportdiscus, CENTRAL, Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science, clinicaltrials.gov, and association websites. Outcomes included pain, range of motion (ROM), and health-related quality of life (HRQL) measures in adult patients with chronic shoulder pain. Data analysis used a Frequentist hierarchical model. CINeMA tool assessed the confidence in the results and Cochrane Risk of Bias tool assessed quality of studies. 54 studies primarily from Europe (40.38%) included 3,893 participants who were followed up to 52 weeks. Shoulder-specific ET (Mean difference (MD) = -2.1; 95% confidence interval (CI) = -3.5 to -0.7) or in combination with electro-physical agents (MD = -2.5; 95% CI = -4.2 to -0.7), injections (MD = -2.4; 95% CI = -3.9 to-1.04) or manual therapy (MD = -2.3; 95% CI = -3.7 to -0.8) decreased pain compared to usual medical care. Trends with ROM and HRQL scores were seen; however, only Manual Therapy (MD = -12.7 and 95% CI = -24.4 to -1.0) achieved meaningfully important changes. Sensitivity analysis excluding studies with high risk of bias showed similar results, with exception of injections that did not reach significance (MD = -1.3; 95% CI = -4.3 to 1.7).
CONCLUSION(S): Shoulder-specific ET provided pain relief up to 52 weeks. Adjunct therapies to shoulder-specific ET added little value in reducing pain. The quality of evidence varied between moderate and very low.
运动疗法(ET)是治疗肩部疼痛的常用早期治疗方法,但关于其促进康复效果的证据并不一致。此外,目前尚不清楚将辅助疗法(如注射、手法治疗、电疗)添加到 ET 中的价值。本研究综合了对慢性肩部疼痛成人的 ET 联合/不联合辅助疗法与常规医疗比较的研究中的直接和间接证据。
使用网络荟萃分析,在 MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL、Sportdiscus、CENTRAL、会议论文引文索引-科学、clinicaltrials.gov 和协会网站中确定了比较 ET 联合辅助疗法的随机对照试验。纳入研究的结局包括慢性肩部疼痛成年患者的疼痛、活动范围(ROM)和健康相关生活质量(HRQL)指标。数据分析采用 Frequentist 分层模型。CINeMA 工具评估结果的可信度,Cochrane 偏倚风险工具评估研究质量。54 项研究主要来自欧洲(40.38%),共纳入 3893 名参与者,随访时间最长为 52 周。肩部特定 ET(平均差值(MD)=-2.1;95%置信区间(CI)=-3.5 至-0.7)或与电物理因子联合(MD=-2.5;95%CI=-4.2 至-0.7)、注射(MD=-2.4;95%CI=-3.9 至-1.04)或手法治疗(MD=-2.3;95%CI=-3.7 至-0.8)与常规医疗相比,疼痛减轻。ROM 和 HRQL 评分也有趋势,但只有手法治疗(MD=-12.7,95%CI=-24.4 至-1.0)有显著意义的变化。排除高偏倚风险研究的敏感性分析显示了类似的结果,但注射治疗未达到显著水平(MD=-1.3;95%CI=-4.3 至 1.7)。
肩部特定 ET 可缓解疼痛长达 52 周。肩部特定 ET 联合辅助疗法在减轻疼痛方面价值不大。证据质量在中等和极低之间存在差异。