Suppr超能文献

家庭力量训练与家庭平衡训练对膝骨关节炎患者疼痛的影响无差异:一项随机试验。

No difference between home-based strength training and home-based balance training on pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomised trial.

作者信息

Chaipinyo Kanda, Karoonsupcharoen Orapin

机构信息

Division of Physical Therapy, Srinakharinwirot University, Nakhon-nayok 26120, Thailand.

出版信息

Aust J Physiother. 2009;55(1):25-30. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(09)70057-1.

Abstract

QUESTION

Is four weeks of home-based balance training more effective than four weeks of home-based strength training at decreasing pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis?

DESIGN

Randomised trial with concealed allocation and assessor blinding.

PARTICIPANTS

48 community volunteers with knee osteoarthritis.

INTERVENTION

Two groups undertook home-based exercise programs: one group performed balance training and the other performed strength training. Participants performed 30 repetitions/leg/day, 5 days/week for four weeks.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score was used to evaluate pain, which was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were the other subscales of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (other symptoms, function in daily living, function in sport and recreation, knee-related quality of life), strength, and mobility.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between groups for pain (mean difference -3 points out of 100, 95% CI -10 to 5). The only between-group difference in the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score was in knee-related quality of life, where the strength group improved 17 points out of 100 (95% CI 5 to 28) more than the balance group. There was no significant difference between groups for strength. The only between-group difference in mobility was in the time taken to walk downstairs, where the strength group improved by 2 s (95% CI 0 to 3) more than the balance group.

CONCLUSION

There was no difference in pain between home-based strength training and home-based balance training in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT 00687726.

摘要

问题

对于膝关节骨关节炎患者,四周的居家平衡训练在减轻疼痛方面是否比四周的居家力量训练更有效?

设计

采用隐藏分配和评估者盲法的随机试验。

参与者

48名患有膝关节骨关节炎的社区志愿者。

干预措施

两组进行居家锻炼计划:一组进行平衡训练,另一组进行力量训练。参与者每条腿每天进行30次重复动作,每周5天,共四周。

观察指标

采用膝关节损伤和骨关节炎疗效评分来评估疼痛,这是主要观察指标。次要观察指标是膝关节损伤和骨关节炎疗效评分的其他子量表(其他症状、日常生活功能、运动和娱乐功能、膝关节相关生活质量)、力量和活动能力。

结果

两组在疼痛方面无显著差异(平均差异为100分制中的-3分,95%置信区间为-10至5)。膝关节损伤和骨关节炎疗效评分中唯一的组间差异在于膝关节相关生活质量,力量训练组比平衡训练组提高了100分制中的17分(95%置信区间为5至28)。两组在力量方面无显著差异。活动能力方面唯一的组间差异在于下楼梯所用时间,力量训练组比平衡训练组快2秒(95%置信区间为0至3)。

结论

对于膝关节骨关节炎患者,居家力量训练和居家平衡训练在疼痛方面没有差异。

试验注册号

NCT 00687726。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验