Suppr超能文献

膝关节骨关节炎的本体感觉训练:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析

Proprioceptive Training for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

作者信息

Wang Yi, Wu Zugui, Chen Zehua, Ye Xiangling, Chen Guoqian, Yang Jiaman, Zhang Peiming, Xie Fang, Guan Yingxin, Wu Jiatao, Chen Weijian, Ye Zixuan, Xu Xuemeng

机构信息

The Fifth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Hangzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Oct 28;8:699921. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.699921. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

There is increased interest in proprioceptive training for knee osteoarthritis (KOA). However, little consensus supports the effectiveness of this intervention. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the effects of proprioceptive training on symptoms, function, and proprioception in people with KOA. The PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases were systematically searched from the inception dates to April 16, 2021 for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Data were pooled by calculating the standardized mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A random-effects model was used for the analyses. A total of 24 RCTs involving 1,275 participants were included in our analysis. This study indicated that compared to no intervention, proprioceptive training significantly improved pain, stiffness, physical function, joint position sense (JPS), muscle strength, mobility, and knee ROM ( < 0.05) in people with KOA. When compared to other non-proprioceptive training, proprioceptive training provided better results in terms of JPS (SMD = -1.28, 95%CI: [-1.64, -0.92], = 0%, < 0.00001) and mobility (timed walk over spongy surface) (SMD = -0.76, 95%CI: [-1.33, -0.18], = 64%, = 0.01), and other results are similar. When proprioceptive training plus other non-proprioceptive training compared to other non-proprioceptive training, the two groups showed similar outcomes, but there was a greater improvement for JPS (SMD = -1.54, 95%CI: [-2.74, -0.34], = 79%, = 0.01), physical function (SMD = -0.34, 95%CI: [-0.56, -0.12], = 0%, = 0.003), and knee ROM ( < 0.05) in the proprioceptive training plus other non-proprioceptive training group. When proprioceptive training plus conventional physiotherapy compared against conventional physiotherapy, the two groups demonstrated similar outcomes, but there was a significant improvement for JPS (SMD = -0.95, 95%CI: [-1.73, -0.18], = 78%, = 0.02) in the proprioceptive training plus conventional physiotherapy group. Proprioceptive training is safe and effective in treating KOA. There is some evidence that proprioceptive training combined with general non-proprioceptive training or conventional physiotherapy appears to be more effective and should be considered as part of the rehabilitation program. However, given that the majority of current studies investigated the short-term effect of these proprioceptive training programs, more large-scale and well-designed studies with long-term follow up are needed to determine the long-term effects of these proprioceptive training regimes in KOA. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#recordDetails, PROSPERO, identifier: CRD42021240587.

摘要

人们对膝关节骨关节炎(KOA)的本体感觉训练越来越感兴趣。然而,对于这种干预措施的有效性,几乎没有一致的支持意见。这项荟萃分析旨在评估本体感觉训练对KOA患者症状、功能和本体感觉的影响。从各数据库建库至2021年4月16日,对PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、科学网和EMBASE数据库进行了系统检索,以查找相关的随机对照试验(RCT)。通过计算标准化平均差(SMD)和95%置信区间(CI)对数据进行汇总。分析采用随机效应模型。我们的分析共纳入了24项涉及1275名参与者的RCT。这项研究表明,与不进行干预相比,本体感觉训练显著改善了KOA患者的疼痛、僵硬、身体功能、关节位置觉(JPS)、肌肉力量、活动能力和膝关节活动度(<0.05)。与其他非本体感觉训练相比,本体感觉训练在JPS(SMD = -1.28,95%CI:[-1.64,-0.92],I² = 0%,P < 0.00001)和活动能力(在海绵表面定时行走)(SMD = -0.76,95%CI:[-1.33,-0.18],I² = 64%,P = 0.01)方面提供了更好的结果,其他结果相似。当将本体感觉训练加其他非本体感觉训练与其他非本体感觉训练进行比较时,两组结果相似,但在本体感觉训练加其他非本体感觉训练组中,JPS(SMD = -1.54,95%CI:[-2.74,-0.34],I² = 79%,P = 0.01)、身体功能(SMD = -0.34,95%CI:[-0.56,-0.12],I² = 0%,P =  0.003)和膝关节活动度(<0.05)有更大改善。当将本体感觉训练加传统物理治疗与传统物理治疗进行比较时,两组结果相似,但在本体感觉训练加传统物理治疗组中,JPS有显著改善(SMD = -0.95,95%CI:[-1.73,-0.18],I² = 78%,P = 0.02)。本体感觉训练在治疗KOA方面是安全有效的。有一些证据表明,本体感觉训练与一般非本体感觉训练或传统物理治疗相结合似乎更有效,应被视为康复计划的一部分。然而,鉴于目前大多数研究调查的是这些本体感觉训练计划的短期效果,需要更多大规模、设计良好且有长期随访的研究来确定这些本体感觉训练方案对KOA的长期影响。https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#recordDetails,PROSPERO,标识符:CRD42021240587

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c60/8581183/f9d0e22fb727/fmed-08-699921-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验