Van Buskirk J, Steiner U K
Institute of Zoology, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
J Evol Biol. 2009 Apr;22(4):852-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01685.x. Epub 2009 Feb 14.
Organisms are capable of an astonishing repertoire of phenotypic responses to the environment, and these often define important adaptive solutions to heterogeneous and unpredictable conditions. The terms 'phenotypic plasticity' and 'canalization' indicate whether environmental variation has a large or small effect on the phenotype. The evolution of canalization and plasticity is influenced by optimizing selection-targeting traits within environments, but inherent fitness costs of plasticity may also be important. We present a meta-analysis of 27 studies (of 16 species of plant and 7 animals) that have measured selection on the degree of plasticity independent of the characters expressed within environments. Costs of plasticity and canalization were equally frequent and usually mild; large costs were observed only in studies with low sample size. We tested the importance of several covariates, but only the degree of environmental stress was marginally positively related to the cost of plasticity. These findings suggest that costs of plasticity are often weak, and may influence phenotypic evolution only under stressful conditions.
生物体能够对环境做出一系列惊人的表型反应,而这些反应往往定义了应对异质且不可预测环境条件的重要适应性解决方案。“表型可塑性”和“发育稳定性”这两个术语表明环境变化对表型的影响是大还是小。发育稳定性和可塑性的进化受到环境中优化选择目标性状的影响,但可塑性的内在适应性成本也可能很重要。我们对27项研究(涉及16种植物和7种动物)进行了荟萃分析,这些研究测量了独立于环境中表达性状的可塑性程度的选择。可塑性和发育稳定性的成本同样常见,且通常较小;仅在样本量低的研究中观察到较大成本。我们测试了几个协变量的重要性,但只有环境压力程度与可塑性成本呈微弱正相关。这些发现表明,可塑性成本通常较弱,可能仅在压力条件下影响表型进化。