Hamann Elena, Groen Simon C, Dunivant Taryn S, Ćalić Irina, Cochran Colleen, Konshok Rachel, Purugganan Michael D, Franks Steven J
Department of Biological Sciences, Fordham University, Bronx, New York, USA.
Department of Biology, Institute of Plant Ecology and Evolution, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Mol Ecol. 2024 Aug 30:e17522. doi: 10.1111/mec.17522.
Gene expression can be highly plastic in response to environmental variation. However, we know little about how expression plasticity is shaped by natural selection and evolves in wild and domesticated species. We used genotypic selection analysis to characterize selection on drought-induced plasticity of over 7,500 leaf transcripts of 118 rice accessions (genotypes) from different environmental conditions grown in a field experiment. Gene expression plasticity was neutral for most gradually plastic transcripts, but transcripts with discrete patterns of expression showed stronger selection on expression plasticity. Whether plasticity was adaptive and co-gradient or maladaptive and counter-gradient varied among varietal groups. No transcripts that experienced selection for plasticity across environments showed selection against plasticity within environments, indicating a lack of evidence for costs of adaptive plasticity that may constrain its evolution. Selection on expression plasticity was influenced by degree of plasticity, transcript length and gene body methylation. We observed positive selection on plasticity of co-expression modules containing transcripts involved in photosynthesis, translation and responsiveness to abiotic stress. Taken together, these results indicate that patterns of selection on expression plasticity were context-dependent and likely associated with environmental conditions of varietal groups, but that the evolution of adaptive plasticity would likely not be constrained by opposing patterns of selection on plasticity within compared to across environments. These results offer a genome-wide view of patterns of selection and ecological constraints on gene expression plasticity and provide insights into the interplay between plastic and evolutionary responses to drought at the molecular level.
基因表达可因环境变化而具有高度可塑性。然而,我们对表达可塑性如何受自然选择塑造以及在野生和驯化物种中如何进化知之甚少。我们利用基因型选择分析来表征对来自田间试验中不同环境条件下种植的118份水稻种质(基因型)的7500多个叶片转录本的干旱诱导可塑性的选择。对于大多数逐渐具有可塑性的转录本,基因表达可塑性呈中性,但具有离散表达模式的转录本对表达可塑性表现出更强的选择。可塑性是适应性的且呈共梯度变化还是非适应性的且呈反梯度变化,在不同品种组之间有所不同。在不同环境中经历可塑性选择的转录本,在环境内部均未表现出对可塑性的反向选择,这表明缺乏可能限制其进化的适应性可塑性成本的证据。对表达可塑性的选择受可塑性程度、转录本长度和基因体甲基化的影响。我们观察到对包含参与光合作用、翻译和对非生物胁迫响应的转录本的共表达模块的可塑性存在正选择。综上所述,这些结果表明对表达可塑性的选择模式取决于具体情况,可能与品种组的环境条件有关,但适应性可塑性的进化可能不会受到与跨环境相比环境内部对可塑性的反向选择模式的限制。这些结果提供了基因表达可塑性选择模式和生态限制的全基因组视角,并在分子水平上深入了解了对干旱的可塑性和进化响应之间的相互作用。