• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童天然橡胶乳胶过敏:3年舌下免疫疗法的临床和免疫学效应

Natural rubber latex allergy in children: clinical and immunological effects of 3-years sublingual immunotherapy.

作者信息

Bernardini R, Pecora S, Milani M, Burastero S E

机构信息

Paediatric Allergy and Pneumology Centre, Anna Meyer Children's Hospital, Florence, Italy.

出版信息

Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008 Dec;40(4):142-7.

PMID:19227650
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We previously demonstrated that one year of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) with natural rubber latex (NRL) was safe and efficacious in paediatric patients with NRL allergy.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We studied 12 NRL-allergic children (age 4-15), previously assigned to the treated arm of a double-blind placebo controlled study, who received a commercial latex SLIT for three years. Adverse reactions were monitored. The primary end-point was the NRL glove-use test. As secondary end-points, skin prick test with NRL and NRL serum specific IgE were used.

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES

No SLIT-related side effects were observed. A significant reduction of the glove-use score was observed after one-year treatment (5.1 +/- 4.2 vs. 14.8 +/- 5.7, p=0.0031). This parameter was further reduced in the second year since SLIT start (2.0 +/- 2.7, p=000007). After 3 years of SLIT all patients had a negative glove-use test (p<0.0001). Baseline wheal areas of skin prick test (6.8 +/- 2.5 mm2) were significantly reduced after 2 (5.3 +/- 1.8 mm2) and 3 years (4.0 +/- 1.8 mm2) of SLIT (p=0.039 and 0.027, respectively). Baseline values of serum specific IgE (23 +/- 34 KU/l) were significantly reduced after 3 years since SLIT start (6.4 +/- 5.0, p=0.0371).

CONCLUSIONS

Three years of latex SLIT is safe and consolidates the efficacy previously observed after one year of treatment in paediatric patients.

摘要

背景

我们之前证明,对天然橡胶乳胶(NRL)过敏的儿科患者进行为期一年的舌下免疫疗法(SLIT)是安全有效的。

研究设计与方法

我们研究了12名对NRL过敏的儿童(年龄4 - 15岁),这些儿童之前被分配到一项双盲安慰剂对照研究的治疗组,接受了三年的商用乳胶SLIT治疗。监测不良反应。主要终点是NRL手套使用测试。作为次要终点,使用了NRL皮肤点刺试验和NRL血清特异性IgE。

主要观察指标

未观察到与SLIT相关的副作用。治疗一年后,手套使用评分显著降低(5.1±4.2对14.8±5.7,p = 0.0031)。自开始SLIT治疗的第二年,该参数进一步降低(2.0±2.7,p = 0.000007)。经过3年的SLIT治疗,所有患者的手套使用测试均为阴性(p < 0.0001)。SLIT治疗2年(5.3±1.8 mm²)和3年(4.0±1.8 mm²)后,皮肤点刺试验的基线风团面积(6.8±2.5 mm²)显著减小(分别为p = 0.039和0.027)。自开始SLIT治疗3年后,血清特异性IgE的基线值(23±34 KU/l)显著降低(6.4±5.0,p = 0.0371)。

结论

三年的乳胶SLIT治疗是安全的,并巩固了之前在儿科患者一年治疗后观察到的疗效。

相似文献

1
Natural rubber latex allergy in children: clinical and immunological effects of 3-years sublingual immunotherapy.儿童天然橡胶乳胶过敏:3年舌下免疫疗法的临床和免疫学效应
Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008 Dec;40(4):142-7.
2
Sublingual immunotherapy with a latex extract in paediatric patients: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.儿童患者舌下含服乳胶提取物免疫疗法:一项双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 Aug;22(8):1515-22. doi: 10.1185/030079906X115711.
3
Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of sublingual immunotherapy in patients with latex-induced urticaria: a 12-month study.乳胶诱导性荨麻疹患者舌下免疫疗法的双盲、安慰剂对照研究:一项为期12个月的研究。
Br J Dermatol. 2007 Apr;156(4):674-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07738.x.
4
Component-resolved immunologic modifications, efficacy, and tolerance of latex sublingual immunotherapy in children.儿童乳胶舌下免疫治疗的成分解析免疫改变、疗效和耐受性。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2012 May;108(5):367-72. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2012.03.005. Epub 2012 Mar 30.
5
Sublingual immunotherapy with natural rubber latex: a case report with 8-year follow-up.天然橡胶乳胶舌下免疫疗法:一项长达8年随访的病例报告
Contact Dermatitis. 2010 Jul;63(1):53-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2010.01746.x.
6
Sensitivity and specificity of different skin prick tests with latex extracts in pediatric patients with suspected natural rubber latex allergy--a cohort study.疑似天然橡胶乳胶过敏的儿科患者中不同乳胶提取物皮肤点刺试验的敏感性和特异性——一项队列研究
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2008 Jun;19(4):315-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2007.00662.x. Epub 2008 Feb 5.
7
Tolerance and effects on skin reactivity to latex of sublingual rush immunotherapy with a latex extract.舌下速发型乳胶提取物免疫疗法对乳胶耐受性及皮肤反应性的影响
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2004;14(1):17-25.
8
Natural rubber latex and hymenoptera venoms share ImmunoglobinE-epitopes accounting for cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants.天然橡胶乳胶和膜翅目毒液具有共同的免疫球蛋白E表位,这些表位构成了交叉反应性碳水化合物决定簇。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2006 Nov;36(11):1446-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2006.02587.x.
9
Latex sublingual immunotherapy: can its safety be predicted?乳胶舌下免疫疗法:其安全性可预测吗?
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2010 Apr;104(4):339-42. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2010.01.014.
10
Efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy with high-dose mite extracts in asthma: a multi-center, double-blind, randomized, and placebo-controlled study in Taiwan.高剂量螨提取物舌下免疫疗法治疗哮喘的疗效:台湾一项多中心、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照研究
Respir Med. 2006 Aug;100(8):1374-83. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2005.11.016. Epub 2006 Jan 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Latex Allergy: Current Status and Future Perspectives.乳胶过敏:现状与未来展望
J Asthma Allergy. 2020 Sep 28;13:385-398. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S242058. eCollection 2020.
2
Latex immunotherapy: evidence of effectiveness.乳胶免疫疗法:有效性证据。
Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2018 Apr;35(2):145-150. doi: 10.5114/ada.2018.75235. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
3
Clinical practice: Allergen-specific immunotherapy in children: facts and FAQs.临床实践:儿童变应原特异性免疫治疗:事实与常见问题解答。
Eur J Pediatr. 2011 Feb;170(2):137-48. doi: 10.1007/s00431-010-1348-7. Epub 2010 Dec 10.