Williams Philip A, White Andrew M, Clark Suzanne, Ferraro Damien J, Swiercz Waldemar, Staley Kevin J, Dudek F Edward
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, USA.
J Neurosci. 2009 Feb 18;29(7):2103-12. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0980-08.2009.
Acquired epilepsy (i.e., after an insult to the brain) is often considered to be a progressive disorder, and the nature of this hypothetical progression remains controversial. Antiepileptic drug treatment necessarily confounds analyses of progressive changes in human patients with acquired epilepsy. Here, we describe experiments testing the hypothesis that development of acquired epilepsy begins as a continuous process of increased seizure frequency (i.e., proportional to probability of a spontaneous seizure) that ultimately plateaus. Using nearly continuous surface cortical and bilateral hippocampal recordings with radiotelemetry and semiautomated seizure detection, the frequency of electrographically recorded seizures (both convulsive and nonconvulsive) was analyzed quantitatively for approximately 100 d after kainate-induced status epilepticus in adult rats. The frequency of spontaneous recurrent seizures was not a step function of time (as implied by the "latent period"); rather, seizure frequency increased as a sigmoid function of time. The distribution of interseizure intervals was nonrandom, suggesting that seizure clusters (i.e., short interseizure intervals) obscured the early stages of progression, and may have contributed to the increase in seizure frequency. These data suggest that (1) the latent period is the first of many long interseizure intervals and a poor measure of the time frame of epileptogenesis, (2) epileptogenesis is a continuous process that extends much beyond the first spontaneous recurrent seizure, (3) uneven seizure clustering contributes to the variability in occurrence of epileptic seizures, and (4) the window for antiepileptogenic therapies aimed at suppressing acquired epilepsy probably extends well past the first clinical seizure.
获得性癫痫(即脑损伤后发生的癫痫)通常被认为是一种进行性疾病,而这种假设性进展的本质仍存在争议。抗癫痫药物治疗必然会混淆对获得性癫痫人类患者进行性变化的分析。在此,我们描述了一些实验,以检验以下假设:获得性癫痫的发展始于癫痫发作频率持续增加(即与自发发作的概率成正比)的过程,最终趋于平稳。利用无线电遥测技术进行近乎连续的表面皮质和双侧海马记录,并采用半自动癫痫发作检测方法,对成年大鼠在注射红藻氨酸诱发癫痫持续状态后约100天内,通过脑电图记录的癫痫发作(惊厥性和非惊厥性)频率进行了定量分析。自发复发性癫痫发作的频率并非时间的阶跃函数(如“潜伏期”所暗示的那样);相反,癫痫发作频率随时间呈S形函数增加。发作间期的分布并非随机,这表明发作簇(即短发作间期)掩盖了进展的早期阶段,并且可能导致了癫痫发作频率的增加。这些数据表明:(1)潜伏期是许多长发作间期的第一个,不能很好地衡量癫痫发生的时间框架;(2)癫痫发生是一个持续的过程,远远超出首次自发复发性癫痫发作;(3)不均匀的发作簇导致癫痫发作发生的变异性;(4)旨在抑制获得性癫痫的抗癫痫发生疗法的窗口期可能远远超过首次临床发作。