Carey R D, Tilyard M W, Morris R W
Department of General Practice, University of Otago Medical School, Dunedin.
N Z Med J. 1991 Sep 25;104(920):401-3.
to assess the efficacy of Abbott Testpack Strep A compared with throat culture for the diagnosis of group A beta-haemolytic streptococcus in general practice.
one hundred and fifty-four specimens were obtained from general practices in selected regions, and were tested for group A beta-haemolytic streptococcus using both Abbott Testpack Strep A and throat culture.
sensitivity of the rapid diagnostic test was 79.4%, specificity 93.3%. The negative predictive value of the test was 94.1%; the positive predictive value 77.1%.
maximum cost effectiveness is achieved, with respect to short term costs and benefits, by diagnosing and treating solely on the basis of Abbott Testpack Strep A results. When possible complications are taken into consideration, initial testing by Abbott Testpack Strep A, followed by confirmatory laboratory testing of negative Testpack results becomes a feasible alternative.
评估在全科医疗中,与咽拭子培养相比,雅培A群链球菌检测试剂盒用于诊断A群β溶血性链球菌的效果。
从选定地区的全科医疗机构获取154份样本,同时使用雅培A群链球菌检测试剂盒和咽拭子培养对样本进行A群β溶血性链球菌检测。
快速诊断检测的灵敏度为79.4%,特异性为93.3%。该检测的阴性预测值为94.1%;阳性预测值为77.1%。
仅根据雅培A群链球菌检测试剂盒的结果进行诊断和治疗,就短期成本和效益而言,可实现最大成本效益。若考虑可能出现的并发症,先采用雅培A群链球菌检测试剂盒进行初步检测,然后对检测结果为阴性的样本进行实验室确认检测,这是一种可行的替代方法。