Suppr超能文献

心肌梗死标准的通用定义会导致心肌梗死的过度诊断吗?

Will the universal definition of myocardial infarction criteria result in an overdiagnosis of myocardial infarction?

作者信息

Eggers Kai M, Lind Lars, Venge Per, Lindahl Bertil

机构信息

Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, Sweden.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2009 Mar 1;103(5):588-91. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.11.007. Epub 2008 Dec 26.

Abstract

The Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (acute myocardial infarction [AMI]) requires detection of increasing or decreasing cardiac biomarkers (preferably cardiac troponin) with >or=1 value >99(th) percentile, together with either clinical symptoms, new ischemic electrocardiographic changes, or typical imaging findings indicative of myocardial necrosis as diagnostic criteria for AMI. However, a small cardiac troponin elevation together with ST-T segment abnormalities may also occur in clinically stable populations. Accordingly, 0.6% of elderly subjects from a community sample (PIVUS Study) and 6.7% of patients stabilized after an acute coronary syndrome (FRISC II Study) would have been labeled AMI following the Universal Definition of AMI when diagnostic classification had been based on a single cardiac troponin I result. In conclusion, our results emphasized the importance of a significant change in cardiac troponin to avoid misdiagnosis of AMI.

摘要

心肌梗死的通用定义(急性心肌梗死[AMI])要求检测到心脏生物标志物(最好是心肌肌钙蛋白)升高或降低,且至少有1个值大于第99百分位数,同时伴有临床症状、新的缺血性心电图改变或提示心肌坏死的典型影像学表现,作为AMI的诊断标准。然而,在临床稳定人群中也可能出现心肌肌钙蛋白轻度升高并伴有ST-T段异常的情况。因此,根据心肌梗死的通用定义,如果诊断分类基于单次心肌肌钙蛋白I检测结果,那么社区样本(PIVUS研究)中的0.6%老年受试者以及急性冠状动脉综合征后病情稳定的患者(FRISC II研究)中的6.7%会被诊断为AMI。总之,我们的结果强调了心肌肌钙蛋白显著变化对于避免AMI误诊的重要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验