Wang Dongjin, Wang Qiang, Yang Xiubin, Wu Qingyu, Li Qingguo
Department of Thoracic Surgery, the Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, Peoples Republic of China.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Mar;87(3):704-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.11.059.
Minimally invasive valve surgery is becoming a safe and cosmetic alternative to standard median sternotomy (SMS). This retrospective study reviews our results and experience with a right vertical infraaxillary thoracotomy (RVIAT) technique for mitral valve replacement (MVR) compared with SMS.
Between December, 2003 and February, 2007, 192 patients underwent MVR through RVIAT (group 1). This group was compared with 203 patients who underwent MVR using SMS during the same period (group 2).
Hospital mortality was 1 of 192 (0.5%) patients in group 1 and 1 of 203 (0.5%) patients in group 2 (p > 0.05). There was no late death in either group. The mean length of incision was significantly shorter in group 1 than that in group 2 (8.7 +/- 2.2 cm vs 23.5 +/- 2.5 cm, p < 0.05). The time to establish cardiopulmonary bypass was longer in group 1 (35.8 +/- 7.6 vs 28.3 +/- 6.5 minutes, p < 0.05). Group 1 had less chest drainage than group 2 (171 +/- 21 vs 336 +/- 46 mL, p < 0.05) and required less blood transfusion (159 +/- 19 vs 446 +/- 16 mL, p < 0.05). Postoperative mechanical ventilation time was also less in group 1 (4.5 +/- 1.2 vs 6.5 +/- 3.2 hours, p < 0.05). There were no statistical differences in aortic cross-clamp time, cardiopulmonary bypass time, and total operation time between the two groups.
The RVIAT can be performed with favorable cosmetic and clinical results. It provides a good alternative to standard median sternotomy for MVR.
微创瓣膜手术正成为标准正中胸骨切开术(SMS)的一种安全且美观的替代方法。本回顾性研究对比了我们采用右腋下垂直胸廓切开术(RVIAT)技术进行二尖瓣置换术(MVR)与采用SMS技术的结果和经验。
2003年12月至2007年2月期间,192例患者通过RVIAT接受了MVR(第1组)。该组与同期203例采用SMS接受MVR的患者(第2组)进行对比。
第1组192例患者中有1例(0.5%)院内死亡,第2组203例患者中有1例(0.5%)院内死亡(p>0.05)。两组均无晚期死亡病例。第1组的平均切口长度显著短于第2组(8.7±2.2厘米对23.5±2.5厘米,p<0.05)。第1组建立体外循环的时间更长(35.8±7.6对28.3±6.5分钟,p<0.05)。第1组的胸腔引流量少于第2组(171±21对336±46毫升,p<0.05),且输血需求更少(159±19对446±16毫升,p<0.05)。第1组术后机械通气时间也更短(4.5±1.2对6.5±3.2小时,p<0.05)。两组之间在主动脉阻断时间、体外循环时间和总手术时间方面无统计学差异。
RVIAT手术可取得良好的美观效果和临床结果。它为MVR提供了一种优于标准正中胸骨切开术的良好替代方法。