Smith Robert L, Ellman Peter I, Thompson Peter W, Girotti Micah E, Mettler Bret A, Ailawadi Gorav, Peeler Benjamin B, Kern John A, Kron Irving L
Department of Surgery, Division of Thoracic Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Mar;87(3):742-7. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.12.050.
Dogma suggests optimal myocardial protection in cardiac surgery after prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) with patent left internal thoracic artery (LITA) pedicle graft requires clamping the graft. However, we hypothesized that leaving a patent LITA-left anterior descending (LAD) graft unclamped would not affect mortality from reoperative cardiac surgery.
Data were collected on reoperative cardiac surgery patients with prior LITA-LAD grafts from July 1995 through June 2006 at our institution. With the LITA unclamped, myocardial protection was obtained initially with antegrade cardioplegia followed by regular, retrograde cardioplegia boluses and systemic hypothermia. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database definitions were employed. The primary outcome was perioperative mortality. Variables were evaluated for association with mortality by bivariate and multivariate analyses.
In all, 206 reoperations were identified involving patients with a patent LITA-LAD graft. Of these, 118 (57%) did not have their LITA pedicle clamped compared with 88 (43%) who did. There were 15 nonsurvivors (7%): 8 of 188 (6.8%) in the unclamped group and 7 of 88 (8.0%) in the clamped group (p = 0.750). Nonsurvivors had more renal failure (p = 0.007), congestive heart failure (p = 0.017), and longer perfusion times (p = 0.010). When controlling for independently associated variables for mortality, namely, perfusion time (odds ratio 1.014 per minute; 95% confidence interval: 1.004 to 1.023; p = 0.004) and renal failure (odds ratio 4.146; 95% confidence interval: 1.280 to 13.427; p = 0.018), an unclamped LITA did not result in any increased mortality (odds ratio 1.370; 95% confidence interval: 0.448 to 4.191). Importantly, the process of dissecting out the LITA resulted in 7 graft injuries, 2 of which significantly altered the operation.
In cardiac surgery after CABG, leaving the LITA graft unclamped did not change mortality but may reduce the risk of patent graft injury, which may alter an operation.
传统观念认为,对于既往接受过冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)且左乳内动脉(LITA)蒂移植血管通畅的患者,心脏手术中实现最佳心肌保护需要夹闭该移植血管。然而,我们推测不夹闭通畅的LITA - 左前降支(LAD)移植血管不会影响再次心脏手术的死亡率。
收集了1995年7月至2006年6月在我院接受再次心脏手术且既往有LITA - LAD移植血管的患者的数据。在不夹闭LITA的情况下,最初通过顺行心脏停搏液实现心肌保护,随后给予常规逆行心脏停搏液推注和全身低温。采用胸外科医师协会国家数据库的定义。主要结局是围手术期死亡率。通过双变量和多变量分析评估变量与死亡率的相关性。
共确定了206例再次手术患者,其LITA - LAD移植血管通畅。其中,118例(57%)未夹闭LITA蒂,88例(43%)夹闭了LITA蒂。有15例死亡(7%):未夹闭组188例中有8例(6.8%),夹闭组88例中有7例(8.0%)(p = 0.750)。死亡患者有更多的肾衰竭(p = 0.007)、充血性心力衰竭(p = 0.017)和更长的灌注时间(p = 0.010)。在控制与死亡率独立相关的变量,即灌注时间(每分钟比值比1.014;95%置信区间:1.004至1.023;p = 0.004)和肾衰竭(比值比4.146;95%置信区间:1.280至13.427;p = 0.018)后,不夹闭LITA不会导致死亡率增加(比值比1.370;95%置信区间:0.448至4.191)。重要的是,游离LITA的过程导致7例移植血管损伤,其中2例显著改变了手术。
在CABG后的心脏手术中,不夹闭LITA移植血管不会改变死亡率,但可能降低移植血管损伤的风险,而移植血管损伤可能会改变手术。